2013
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2012.2225057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Analysis of Compressed Sensing Radar Detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In pulse-Doppler processing, some works [16,17] are towards detection of targets while other [18~23] are about the extraction of radar target's information (Doppler, range and amplitude). These pioneering works show that the processing effectiveness is highly dependent on the measurement matrix or the sub-Nyquist sampling system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pulse-Doppler processing, some works [16,17] are towards detection of targets while other [18~23] are about the extraction of radar target's information (Doppler, range and amplitude). These pioneering works show that the processing effectiveness is highly dependent on the measurement matrix or the sub-Nyquist sampling system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The targets follow a near constant velocity dynamic model as in (1). The clutter is assumed uniformly distributed with density 1×10 −5 /m 3 .…”
Section: Distributed Compressed Sensing Based Joint Detection and Tramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the classical compressed sensing based radar system, the sparse vector is constructed based on the range (delay), angle, Doppler measurements or combination set of them [18,5,45,25,1,3]. The state vector has to be estimated at each scan based on the reconstructed range (delay), angle, Doppler measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very little work has yet evaluated exploitation performance with compressive [28,29] or sparsityconstrained [30,31] systems. Here we comment on constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detection.…”
Section: E Nonlinear Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%