2018
DOI: 10.15689/ap.2018.1704.5.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desenvolvimento de um banco de itens para avaliar o transtorno depressivo maior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the information area of each item, total information charts, and error of each component and analysis of the item characteristics curves (ICCs) were analyzed. The ICCs were interpreted according to three standards as recommended by Sales et al (2018): Standard 1 represents the items where the three intermediate response categories were overlapped by the end categories (values 0 and 3); Standard 2 consists of those ICCs where only one of the categories of response, among the two intermediate categories (1 and 2), was more likely to be endorsed than the others at some point in theta level; and Standard 3 occurs when all categories of response at some point in the theta scale were more likely to endorse than the others. The latter is the most desirable pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the information area of each item, total information charts, and error of each component and analysis of the item characteristics curves (ICCs) were analyzed. The ICCs were interpreted according to three standards as recommended by Sales et al (2018): Standard 1 represents the items where the three intermediate response categories were overlapped by the end categories (values 0 and 3); Standard 2 consists of those ICCs where only one of the categories of response, among the two intermediate categories (1 and 2), was more likely to be endorsed than the others at some point in theta level; and Standard 3 occurs when all categories of response at some point in the theta scale were more likely to endorse than the others. The latter is the most desirable pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%