1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1985.tb01326.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desensitization treatment of agoraphobia

Abstract: Clinical literature on desensitization treatment of agoraphobia is reviewed. The popular belief that in vivo desensitization is generally superior to imaginal exposure is critically examined. Studies which do not support this belief are reviewed, and the implications for clinical practice are considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…exclusive of potentially useful procedures such as imaginal exposure) for the treatment of phobic fear and avoidance. When the findings of the present review of flooding are considered alongside similar conclusions concerning imaginal and in vivo desensitization (James, 1985), there would appear to be strong support for the cautionary comment by Chambless et al (1982) that "we may be abandoning imaginal exposure too precipitously" (p. 230).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…exclusive of potentially useful procedures such as imaginal exposure) for the treatment of phobic fear and avoidance. When the findings of the present review of flooding are considered alongside similar conclusions concerning imaginal and in vivo desensitization (James, 1985), there would appear to be strong support for the cautionary comment by Chambless et al (1982) that "we may be abandoning imaginal exposure too precipitously" (p. 230).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…However, with regard to desensitization, it appears that claims attributing superiority to in vivo over imaginal desensitization have confounded the results of analogue studies of fear and avoidance with the results of studies involving clinical populations. When only clinical literature was considered, James (1985) found that contrary to frequent claims neither imaginal nor in vivo desensitization showed any consistent superiority over the other. In view of this finding, the present review examined the claim that in vivo flooding is generally superior to imaginal flooding in the management of clinical fear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As such, most of what passes for cognitive theory and practice can be more clearly explained in terms of the principles that describe the role and functions of rulegoverned behaviour. Moreover, this analysis is consistent with a large volume of empirical data on the successful treatment of anxiety disorders, which suggests that processes involved in anxiety reduction are essentially both cognitive and enactive (i.e., involve symbolic and direct experience) (James, 1985(James, ,1986.…”
Section: Cognitive Therapysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Moreover, this analysis is consistent with a large volume of empirical data on the successful treatment of anxiety disorders, which suggests that processes involved in anxiety reduction are essentially both cognitive and enactive (i.e., involve symbolic and direct experience) (James, 1985(James, ,1986. Practice provides conditioning opportunities, and these further strengthen the discriminative-stimulus properties of relevant cognitions (i.e., thoughts beliefs, self-statements, etc.)…”
Section: Cognitive Therapysupporting
confidence: 79%