2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352002000500012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho de coelhos em crescimento criados em diferentes densidades populacionais

Abstract: O objetivo deste experimento foi avaliar o desempenho de coelhos em crescimento criados em diferentes densidades populacionais. Foram utilizados 136 coelhos, não sexados, desmamados aos 35 dias de idade, em delineamento em blocos ao acaso, com quatro tratamentos e quatro repetições. As densidades avaliadas foram 11,67; 13,34; 15 e 16,67 coelhos/m², correspondentes à ocupação de sete, oito, nove e dez coelhos/gaiola. O período experimental foi de seis semanas. Os coelhos e a ração foram pesados para obtenção do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data obtained in this study are in accordance with those found by Oliveira et al (2005), who assessed the performance of broiler chickens reared at two stocking densities (10 and 14 birds m , birds had a higher feed intake. These results are also in accordance with those found by Lana et al (2001), who studied stocking densities of 10, 12, and 16 birds m −2 and two feeding programs composed of different feed types.…”
Section: Stocking Density (Birds Msupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The data obtained in this study are in accordance with those found by Oliveira et al (2005), who assessed the performance of broiler chickens reared at two stocking densities (10 and 14 birds m , birds had a higher feed intake. These results are also in accordance with those found by Lana et al (2001), who studied stocking densities of 10, 12, and 16 birds m −2 and two feeding programs composed of different feed types.…”
Section: Stocking Density (Birds Msupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Dessa forma, esse tema foi alvo de várias pesquisas visando avaliar as melhores densidades de estocagem para diferentes espécies animais, em seu ambiente de criação, como aves em galpões (Mortari et al, 2002), suínos em baias (Banhazi et al, 2001), coelhos em gaiolas (Oliveira & Almeida, 2002), camarões em viveiros (Zimmerman & Raupp, 1992) e peixes em tanques e viveiros (Carneiro et al, 1999;Graeff & Pruner, 1999e 2000Vieira et al, 2000;Gomes & Schlindwein, 2000;Souza-Filho & Cerqueira, 2003;Cavero et al, 2003;Salaro et al, 2003). Embora esses estudos tenham sido realizados com espécies diferentes, várias conclusões devem ser verificadas e avaliadas na recria de rãs, observando-se as devidas particularidades.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…However, there are authors that do not report differences with different densities. Oliveira and Almeida (2002) did not detect any effect over productive performance studying densities between 11.7 and 16.7 rabbits/m 2 (600 cm 2 /rabbit or higher), and the production increased when density changed from 26.9 to 38.1 kg/m 2 . Neither Prawirodigdo et al (1985) nor Camacho et al (2003), observed differences in the studied interval (8.6 -14.5 and 12.2-19.6 kits/m 2 , respectively), for what they recommend the highest densities, because that imply less equipment, housing surface and investment joined to an increase of meat production.…”
Section: Housing Systemmentioning
confidence: 69%