2012
DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-8-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Descriptive attributes used in the characterization of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) in rural populations of the Atlantic forest (Misiones-Argentina)

Abstract: BackgroundHuman beings employ a combination of morphological, sensorial, utilitarian, cultural and ecological characters when they identify and classify organisms. Ethnotaxonomy has provided a store of information about the characters cultures employ when they identify and classify a vast diversity of taxonomic groups. Nevertheless, some more research is needed to provide a comparison of the characters employed in the description of taxons, and an analysis of the extent to which those descriptors are represent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to what other studies on traditional knowledge of Meliponini have suggested, our consultants distinguished stingless bees based on a number of morphological, behavioral, ecological, and utilitarian features (Costa-Neto 1998;Posey 1993;Posey and Camargo 1985;Zamudio and Hilgert 2012;Reyes-González et al 2014;Carvalho et al 2014). At first, we hypothesized that the more abundant species would not only offer greater opportunities for cultural experimentation (and thus create the potential for more varied uses) but that these same species would be more easily recognized through a fewer number of attributed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Similar to what other studies on traditional knowledge of Meliponini have suggested, our consultants distinguished stingless bees based on a number of morphological, behavioral, ecological, and utilitarian features (Costa-Neto 1998;Posey 1993;Posey and Camargo 1985;Zamudio and Hilgert 2012;Reyes-González et al 2014;Carvalho et al 2014). At first, we hypothesized that the more abundant species would not only offer greater opportunities for cultural experimentation (and thus create the potential for more varied uses) but that these same species would be more easily recognized through a fewer number of attributed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Zamudio and Hilgert [29] identifying the elements that the local population from northern Argentina uses to classify the stingless bees, also reported morphological (shape, size and color), behavioral (docile, aggressive or shy) and ecological characteristics (external and internal characteristics of the nest).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, en concordancia con Lambaré (2016), acercarse a través de la metodología etnobotánica al estudio de la domesticación de una especie vegetal, registrando las prácticas de manejo sobre el mismo, ha demostrado ser muy valioso en la interpretación de prácticas de cultivo en el pasado y su vínculo con la domesticación de especies vegetales, y tal como sostienen Zamudio & Hilgert (2012) esta información puede ser utilizada por los educadores de la zona de estudio, ya que contienen información biológica y cultural desprendida del conocimiento local, reflejo de la identidad social de estos pobladores.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified