2020
DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2020v42a10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Descriptions of two new genera of Maruinini (Diptera, Psychodidae, Psychodinae) from the Mitaraka range of French Guiana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 784 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comments. Curler (2020) proposed as a diagnostic character the presence of conical setae in the apex of gonostyli, however, these setae are not observed in the new species. This character was not considered as diagnostic of the genus; it is a diagnostic character of Polletomyia subullata Curler, 2020.…”
Section: Polletomyia Curler 2020mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comments. Curler (2020) proposed as a diagnostic character the presence of conical setae in the apex of gonostyli, however, these setae are not observed in the new species. This character was not considered as diagnostic of the genus; it is a diagnostic character of Polletomyia subullata Curler, 2020.…”
Section: Polletomyia Curler 2020mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The genus Polletomyia Curler was proposed for only one species collected in the Amazon Forest of French Guiana, Polletomyia subulata Curler, 2020(Curler 2020. This genus was included in Maruinini (Psychodinae).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological terminology for Diptera follows that of Wood (2009, 2017), Wagner and Ibáñez-Bernal (2010), Curler (2020), ascoids sensu Kvifte and Wagner (2017), ventral epandrial plate or sclerite are used as in Duckhouse (1990), epandrial clasping lobes as in Santos and Curler (2014) which suggested this terminology and include that this is the same that has been called surstyli and cerci in previous papers on Psychodidae, and wing abbreviations CuA 1 and CuA 2 of Stark et al (1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these data of the period prior to the survey (e.g. 2003-2013, analysed by Brûlé & Touroult 2014, it is possible to compare the production of new species in the 5.5 years period between July 1, 2015 December 31, 2020 and to infer the proportion that can be directly assigned to the Mitaraka survey (i.e. species described on the basis of Mitaraka 2015 survey specimens only).…”
Section: References For Comparing the Output Of This Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%