2012
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.026815-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Descriptions of Rhodopseudomonas parapalustris sp. nov., Rhodopseudomonas harwoodiae sp. nov. and Rhodopseudomonas pseudopalustris sp. nov., and emended description of Rhodopseudomonas palustris

Abstract: Descriptions ofT , JA447 and JA490) of red to reddish brown pigmented, rod-shaped, motile and budding phototrophic bacteria were isolated from soil and freshwater sediment samples from different geographical regions of India. All strains contained bacteriochlorophyll a and carotenoids of the spirilloxanthin series. The major cellular fatty acid of strains JA310 T and JA531 T was C 18 : 1 v7c, the quinone was Q-10 and polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, two new species of the genus Rhodopseudomonas, Rhodopseudomonas harwoodiae and Rhodopseudomonas parapalustris, were described and their differentiation from other species of the genus by DNA-DNA hybridization analysis demonstrated similarity values below 50% [9]. This study also supported the recognition of R. rhenobacensis and R. faecalis as separate species and pointed out differences at the species level between the two references of the type of R. palustris, strains DSM 123 and ATCC 17001.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…More recently, two new species of the genus Rhodopseudomonas, Rhodopseudomonas harwoodiae and Rhodopseudomonas parapalustris, were described and their differentiation from other species of the genus by DNA-DNA hybridization analysis demonstrated similarity values below 50% [9]. This study also supported the recognition of R. rhenobacensis and R. faecalis as separate species and pointed out differences at the species level between the two references of the type of R. palustris, strains DSM 123 and ATCC 17001.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…1 e Observations of the strain A7 using AFM (a, b) and TEM (c, d, e). i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 4 0 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 8 6 6 1 e8 6 6 8 strain A7 and Rhodopseudomonas palustris strain ATCC 17001 [24] is shown in Tables 1 and 2. The distinct difference present in the strain ATCC 17001 and strain A7 includes the main fatty acid components and substrate utilization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rhodopseudomonas pseudopalustris was only recently proposed as a species, having previously been considered a strain of Rhodopseudomonas palustris (Ramana et al. ) . Rhodopseudomonas palustris is a member of the alpha proteobacteria that is widely distributed in nature and is considered to be one of the most metabolically versatile bacterial species (Harwood and Gibson ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of sequences from this unclassified genus with the NCBI 16S rRNA database indicated that the majority matched most closely with Rhodopseudomonas pseudopalustris. Rhodopseudomonas pseudopalustris was only recently proposed as a species, having previously been considered a strain of Rhodopseudomonas palustris (Ramana et al 2012). Rhodopseudomonas palustris is a member of the alpha proteobacteria that is widely distributed in nature and is considered to be one of the most metabolically versatile bacterial species (Harwood and Gibson 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%