Abstract:Introduction
The rapid rollout of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines for a large proportion of the population necessitates a strong emphasis on safety. Complementary to the existing spontaneous reporting system, The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb conducted patient-reported cohort event monitoring (CEM).
Objective
The primary aim was to investigate differences in the frequencies of any and commonly reported, ‘well-known’, systemic adverse events fol… Show more
“…29 Our study revealed that most of the post-COVID-19 vaccination adverse events were low to moderate in severity and were not severe enough to require hospitalization and usually resolved within a few days after vaccination and the same trend was reported in several studies. 15,22,25,29 The present study also showed that the reported adverse events were significantly higher among female participants and those who received AstraZeneca vaccination with multivariable-adjusted OR (95% CI) of 2.26 (1.67-3.08) and 4.31 (2.85-6.51), respectively. Gender differences were observed in different studies on different populations with females being more prone to report the occurrence of post-COVID-19 vaccination adverse events than males e.g., Menni and 20 Moreover, a two-phased randomized clinical trial that was conducted in China on Sinopharm vaccine, exhibited more common adverse events in females (55%) compared to males (45%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…However, a recent study in Netherlands reported that Pfizer-BioNTech was the most utilized vaccine type followed by AstraZeneca. 15 Despite that 84% of the Egyptian participants who received two doses of vaccine, 32% and 26.7 % of them, respectively, were hesitant and unwilling to receive a COVID-19 booster vaccine. The proportions were much higher than reported by Paul and Fancourt (2021) who found that among fully vaccinated adults in the UK only 4% were uncertain about receiving and 4% were unwilling to receive a COVID-19 booster vaccine.…”
COVID-19 vaccine recipients are more likely to experience post-vaccination adverse events, which are considered the source of concerns about vaccine safety. This study aims to describe the utilization of COVID-19 vaccines and the associated adverse events and their possible predictors among adult Egyptians. An online cross-sectional study was designed to collect data through a Google Form questionnaire in November 2021. Adults who received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine were asked to report their experience with vaccination and associated adverse events. A total of 853 participants were included in the study after receiving Sinopharm/Sinovac (63%), AstraZeneca (27%), Pfizer-BioNTech (4.8%), and other vaccines (5.2%). Around 50% of participants thought that COVID-19 vaccines were safe, 30.8% advised others with vaccination, and 68.3% reported post-vaccination adverse events. The most commonly encountered adverse symptoms were injection site pain (82.5%), fatigue (67.4%), flu-like symptoms (59.6%), and bone and muscle pains (59.6%). Most adverse events were less likely reported by Sinopharm/Sinovac recipients than recipients of other vaccines. The significant predictors for reporting adverse events were female gender, the first dose of vaccination, and vaccine type (AstraZeneca versus Sinopharm/Sinovac) with multivariable-adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.85 (1.34-2.54); 2.01 (1.24–3.25), and 3.86 (2.54–5.86). Findings revealed that adverse events of COVID-19 vaccines are common. Sinopharm/Sinovac recipients were reported to have lesser adverse events than other recipients. However, serious reactions were rare which ensures the safety of all vaccine types among the adult Egyptian population.
“…29 Our study revealed that most of the post-COVID-19 vaccination adverse events were low to moderate in severity and were not severe enough to require hospitalization and usually resolved within a few days after vaccination and the same trend was reported in several studies. 15,22,25,29 The present study also showed that the reported adverse events were significantly higher among female participants and those who received AstraZeneca vaccination with multivariable-adjusted OR (95% CI) of 2.26 (1.67-3.08) and 4.31 (2.85-6.51), respectively. Gender differences were observed in different studies on different populations with females being more prone to report the occurrence of post-COVID-19 vaccination adverse events than males e.g., Menni and 20 Moreover, a two-phased randomized clinical trial that was conducted in China on Sinopharm vaccine, exhibited more common adverse events in females (55%) compared to males (45%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…However, a recent study in Netherlands reported that Pfizer-BioNTech was the most utilized vaccine type followed by AstraZeneca. 15 Despite that 84% of the Egyptian participants who received two doses of vaccine, 32% and 26.7 % of them, respectively, were hesitant and unwilling to receive a COVID-19 booster vaccine. The proportions were much higher than reported by Paul and Fancourt (2021) who found that among fully vaccinated adults in the UK only 4% were uncertain about receiving and 4% were unwilling to receive a COVID-19 booster vaccine.…”
COVID-19 vaccine recipients are more likely to experience post-vaccination adverse events, which are considered the source of concerns about vaccine safety. This study aims to describe the utilization of COVID-19 vaccines and the associated adverse events and their possible predictors among adult Egyptians. An online cross-sectional study was designed to collect data through a Google Form questionnaire in November 2021. Adults who received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine were asked to report their experience with vaccination and associated adverse events. A total of 853 participants were included in the study after receiving Sinopharm/Sinovac (63%), AstraZeneca (27%), Pfizer-BioNTech (4.8%), and other vaccines (5.2%). Around 50% of participants thought that COVID-19 vaccines were safe, 30.8% advised others with vaccination, and 68.3% reported post-vaccination adverse events. The most commonly encountered adverse symptoms were injection site pain (82.5%), fatigue (67.4%), flu-like symptoms (59.6%), and bone and muscle pains (59.6%). Most adverse events were less likely reported by Sinopharm/Sinovac recipients than recipients of other vaccines. The significant predictors for reporting adverse events were female gender, the first dose of vaccination, and vaccine type (AstraZeneca versus Sinopharm/Sinovac) with multivariable-adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.85 (1.34-2.54); 2.01 (1.24–3.25), and 3.86 (2.54–5.86). Findings revealed that adverse events of COVID-19 vaccines are common. Sinopharm/Sinovac recipients were reported to have lesser adverse events than other recipients. However, serious reactions were rare which ensures the safety of all vaccine types among the adult Egyptian population.
“…Nevertheless, higher number of patients who took ChAdOx1 developed series AEFI compared to patients who took Moderna and Pfizer vaccine. 35 Another study finding indicate that among all immunized individuals more than half (58.1%) of the AEFI, and nearly half (49.5%) of severe adverse events were reported following ChAdOx1 vaccination compared to Moderna and Pfizer vaccines. 36 …”
Background
Ethiopia was using the ChAdOx1 COV-19 vaccine, and health professionals were targets of the first phase of the vaccination strategy. Evidence on the adverse events following immunization (AEFI) was barely available. The study aimed to assess the magnitude and associated factors of adverse events following ChAdOx1 COV-19 immunization among health professionals of the University of Gondar Specialized and Comprehensive Hospital, 2021.
Methods
An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among health professionals of the University of Gondar Comprehensive and specialized referral hospital. All health professionals who took the ChAdOx1 COV-19 vaccine in the 1st phase were surveyed. A total of 314 health professionals who took the ChAdOx1 COV-19 vaccine were included. The EpiData version 4.6.0.0 and Stata 16 were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. A binary logistic regression was used to identify statistically significant factors associated with AEFI. Chi-square and multicollinearity assumptions were tested. A p-value <0.2 and 0.05 were used as cut-off values of significance in the bi- and multivariable logistic regression models, respectively. An adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% CI was reported for statistically significant variables.
Results
Among 314 study participants, 263 of them had at least one mild to severe AEFI of ChAdOx1 COV-19 with a prevalence of AEFI of 83.76% (95% CI: 79.23, 87.46). The commonest AEFI observed were injection site tenderness (n=198/263), fatigue (114/263), headache (n=107/263), and muscle pain (n=85/263). Females (AOR=2.75, 95% CI: 1.15, 6.58), and participants who felt the vaccine was unsafe (AOR=2.84, 95% CI: 1.03, 7.85) were having nearly three times more odds of AEFI immunization as compared to males and those who felt the vaccine was safe, respectively.
Conclusion
Adverse event following immunization has been a public health problem in Northwest Ethiopia. Being female and having a feeling that the vaccine is unsafe were statistically significantly associated with AEFI.
“…This hypothesis is strengthened by a descriptive study of the frequency of adverse events reported after COVID-19 vaccination, where the rate of ADRs reported was lower with mRNA vaccines than with live non-replicating vaccines (rate of adverse effects reported after the first injection: 92.2% with ChAdOx1 nCov-19; 82.0% with Ad26COV2.S vs . 81.7% with mRNA-1273 and 45.2% with Bnt162b2) ( Kant et al, 2022 ).…”
Anti–N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an auto-immune neurological disorder characterized by the presence in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of antibodies against the GluN1 subunit of NMDA receptors in the brain. The etiology of the disease remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the possible existence of pharmacovigilance signals relating to a link between vaccination and the occurrence of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. We performed a case/non-case study using data from the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase) up to 31 December 2021. All individual case study reports (ICSRs) linked to a vaccine and coded with the MedDRA Lower Level Term (LLT) “anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis” were analysed. We calculated the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for each type of vaccine. A total of 29,758,737 ICSRs were registered in VigiBase, of which 70 were coded under the selected LLT, and 29/70 (41.4%) involved a vaccine. Of these cases, 53.8% involved children aged younger than 15 years. The median time to onset of anti-NMDAR encephalitis after vaccination was 4 days (range 0–730). The highest RORs were observed for the diphtheria/polio/tetanus/pertussis vaccine [54.72 (95% CI 26.2–114.3)], yellow fever vaccine [50.02 (95% CI 15.7–159)] and human papillomavirus vaccine [32.89 (15.8–68.7)]. All cases were coded as serious; 13 patients did not recover, or were left with permanent sequelae. Nine patients recovered without sequelae or are on the path to recovery, and one patient died. In summary, pharmacovigilance signals were observed for anti-NMDAR encephalitis and vaccination. Clinicians need to be aware of this potential risk, and encourage to report any case of anti-NMDAR encephalitis occurring after vaccination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.