2013
DOI: 10.1177/0042098013498283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Describing Inequalities in Access to Employment and the Associated Geography of Wellbeing

Abstract: Abstract:This paper addresses three questions: (1) How unequal is access to urban employment and the wellbeing associated with it? (2) What is the monetary value consumers place on access? (3) How does the inequality of access correspond to the geographical pattern of unemployment? We develop a novel approach using the Osland & Pryce (2012) house price model to estimate the Monetary Value of Access Welfare (MVAW)-the wellbeing associated with living a given distance to employment, taking into account the negat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We differ from Cohen and Brown (2017) in that we focus on the houses rather than on commercial real estates. Gibb, Osland and Pryce (2014) consider multiple employment centers of varying size. With data from Glasgow, Scotland, they estimate that the monetary value of access to urban employment contributes around 13% of the average value of a house.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We differ from Cohen and Brown (2017) in that we focus on the houses rather than on commercial real estates. Gibb, Osland and Pryce (2014) consider multiple employment centers of varying size. With data from Glasgow, Scotland, they estimate that the monetary value of access to urban employment contributes around 13% of the average value of a house.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first round of objections to the validity of the SWB approach focused on questioning whether respondents all interpret the subjective scale in the same manner. However, although measurement of SWB appears to rely on an assumption of individual rationality (which a large literature on cognitive bias tells us is unwarranted), SWB has been demonstrated to correlate reliably with many objective measures, such as age [17], income [18], genetics [19], relationships, discrimination against sexual minorities [20], parenting [21], employment and health [22][23][24], innovation [25], living arrangements [26,27], migration [28,29], empowerment [30], environment [31] and mixtures of all the above [32] (although a reviewer of this paper notes a research gap in the meta-analysis of studies of this nature). SWB is also less susceptible than might be thought to measurement bias caused by differences between nations and cultures [33].…”
Section: The Importance Of Subjective Well-being and Limits To Its Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the short run, prices in the labour market are assumed to be close to the equilibrium level, and workers and firms are relatively immobile (Gibb et al 2014). This endogeneity issue is then expected to be less relevant in the case of labour market outcomes.…”
Section: Spatial Mismatch and Labour Market Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%