Descartes’s Indefinitely Extended Universe

Reid, Jasper

doi:10.1017/s0012217318000203

Cited by 9 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 18 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For him, the two are not interrelated. He believed that the material world was indefinitely large: it just carried on going ever further outwards, nowhere terminating in a boundary (Reid, 2019). For Descartes, nothing is added to the ontology of the natural world over and above the arrangements of particles of matter.…”

Section: Human As a "Thinking" Subjectmentioning

confidence: 99%

RETRACTED: The Role of Subject in Kuntowijoyo's Transformative Thought and It's Relevance to The Islamic Social Transformation

Khasri

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following a rigorous, carefully concerns and considered review of the article published in Jurnal Filsafat to article entitled “The Role of Subject in Kuntowijoyo's Transformative Thought and It's Relevance to The Islamic Social Transformation” Vol 30, No 2, pp. 261-286, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.54911 This paper has been found to be in violation of the Jurnal Filsafat Publication principles and will be retracted.The article contained redundant material, the editor investigated and found that the paper published in “The Role of Subjects in Kuntowijoyo's Transformative Thought and It's Relevance to the Prophetical Social Transformation” Vol 4, No 2, pp. 126-144, August 2020, DOI: 10.22146/sasdayajournal.59662The document and its content will be removed from Jurnal Filsafat in the upcoming volume, and reasonable effort should be made to remove all references to this article.

show abstract

Section: Human As a "Thinking" Subjectmentioning

confidence: 99%

RETRACTED: The Role of Subject in Kuntowijoyo's Transformative Thought and It's Relevance to The Islamic Social Transformation

Khasri

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In contrast, Sörensen and Söderbaum () suggest in their Development Dialogue special issue that we have moved beyond the ‘nexus’ altogether, and into a moment defined by increasingly institutionalized securitization and continuous global disaster management. Reid conceptualizes the shift toward global disaster management through changing discursive expressions of security through ‘resilience’, arguing the ‘development–security nexus’ has been replaced by a ‘sustainable development–resilience nexus’, where resilience presupposes a disastrous world requiring constant global disaster management and intervention (Reid, : 72; see also Pupavec, ).…”

Section: The ‘Security–development Nexus’ Counter‐insurgency and The ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Selling Stabilization: Anxious Practices of Militarized Development Contracting

Greenburg¹

2017

Development and Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines how post‐9/11 US military trainings have conscripted development as a weapon of war. The post‐9/11 years saw the increasing dominance of for‐profit international development contractors (IDCs), who, by 2010, were winning more valuable contracts from the US Agency for International Development (USAID) than non‐profit organizations, UN agencies, and the World Bank. This article describes financial, administrative and bureaucratic shifts in the integration of development and defence that have fed into the increasing dominance of IDCs. In the mid‐2000s, USAID developed an instructional framework to translate development for military audiences. The framework speaks to the rejection in this period of the language of ‘hearts and minds’ and the adoption of a technical language of ‘stabilization’ amenable to private contracting. Drawing on ethnographic observations of private civilian contractors teaching the USAID framework on military bases, I examine the contradictions of ‘stabilization’ as a concept sold in private militarized development markets, and as a lived practice of military learning that often conflicts with other dimensions of soldiering.

show abstract

“…Concepts of resilience span a wide range of disciplines and a multiverse of entities (e.g., ecosystems, humans, and world banking), to describe bounces back to health despite disadvantage. Resilience attributes normative and positive meanings to the resilient subject, who “must permanently struggle to accommodate itself to the world” (Reid, 2012, p. 74). What is required is the subject’s ability to conform to promote stability within the system rather than perturb the system.…”

Section: Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

Sowing the seeds: Sociocultural resistance in the psychological sciences.

Jordan

Anderson

Hall

2024

Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This article problematizes the use of resilience as a psychological and developmental indication of well-being. We base our argument on the possibility that resilience theories internalize responsibility for survival within the individual, and that survival is dependent on the ability to assimilate to injustice. Resistance, on the other hand, represents acts of intentional, active, and often collective survival which can expose and oppose social injustice. Method: Bringing together transdisciplinary scholarship on resistance, we propose a conceptual framework of sociocultural resistance. This framework seeks to forward studies of health that acknowledge the complexity of relationships, culture, and power constitutive of the human condition. Results: We provide examples of sociocultural resistance in the psychological and developmental sciences and suggest the use of diverse theory and methods in the study of resistance. Conclusions: Resistance research is a timely, necessary, and critical turning point in the social sciences with the potential to change unjust systems and promote a nuanced view of health. Public Significance StatementScientists who study resilience focus on how individuals and communities cope with adversity to "bounce back" to health. Studies of resilience, which do not also attend to systemic oppression (e.g., racism), overlook opportunities to transform unjust social conditions that impede health and well-being. This conceptual article presents researchers with an alternative perspective to study how marginalized groups resist adversity through the development of a framework of sociocultural resistance.

show abstract

Descartes’s Indefinitely Extended Universe

Cited by 9 publications

References 18 publications

RETRACTED: The Role of Subject in Kuntowijoyo's Transformative Thought and It's Relevance to The Islamic Social Transformation

RETRACTED: The Role of Subject in Kuntowijoyo's Transformative Thought and It's Relevance to The Islamic Social Transformation

Selling Stabilization: Anxious Practices of Militarized Development Contracting

Sowing the seeds: Sociocultural resistance in the psychological sciences.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About