2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dermal absorption study OECD TG 428 mass balance recommendations based on the EFSA database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean human in vitro data from the EFSA dermal absorption database (EFSA DA DB) were selected based on the criteria presented in Kluxen et al ( 2019 ); further “Wax block” and “Pasta bait” formulation types were excluded. Mean human in vitro data using studies with multiple concentrations and mean rat in vitro and in vivo data and corresponding human in vitro data were collected from CLE member companies in a Microsoft Excel (Redmond, USA) sheet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean human in vitro data from the EFSA dermal absorption database (EFSA DA DB) were selected based on the criteria presented in Kluxen et al ( 2019 ); further “Wax block” and “Pasta bait” formulation types were excluded. Mean human in vitro data using studies with multiple concentrations and mean rat in vitro and in vivo data and corresponding human in vitro data were collected from CLE member companies in a Microsoft Excel (Redmond, USA) sheet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating the reference chemical testosterone, Heylings et al [ 27 ] demonstrated that a mass balance of 99% could be achieved for testosterone using a radio-labelled substance and conducting the experiments according to a highly standardised protocol in agreement with OECD TG 428 [ 4 ]. While these results referred to one substance only (testosterone) and are based on an in-house database of in vitro dermal absorption studies on the pesticides of a single laboratory [ 28 ], Kluxen et al [ 29 ] described the EFSA recovery criterion as not realistic based on the interpretation of statistical analysis of the EFSA dataset [ 3 ] on in vitro dermal absorption studies of pesticides, explaining these findings, e.g., with low laboratory standards. In the EU, EFSA requirements [ 3 ] have to be met for pesticides in dermal absorption studies performed according to OECD 428.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%