2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10700-017-9267-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving crisp and consistent priorities for fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria systems using non-linear constrained optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybrid fuzzy‐Delphi‐AHP‐DEMATEL approach has been used for the following reasons: first, selecting the evaluation criteria for sustainable HCWM is MCDM, which involves subjective judgments, perceptions, qualitative inputs, and vague information. Hence, to handle this imprecision, literature has proposed a fuzzy set theory (Goyal & Kaushal, 2018; Kharat et al, 2016). Second, fuzzy‐Delphi can scrutinize the identified criteria by considering the stakeholders' preferences in real‐life situations, which cannot be given in terms of crisp values (Hsu et al, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybrid fuzzy‐Delphi‐AHP‐DEMATEL approach has been used for the following reasons: first, selecting the evaluation criteria for sustainable HCWM is MCDM, which involves subjective judgments, perceptions, qualitative inputs, and vague information. Hence, to handle this imprecision, literature has proposed a fuzzy set theory (Goyal & Kaushal, 2018; Kharat et al, 2016). Second, fuzzy‐Delphi can scrutinize the identified criteria by considering the stakeholders' preferences in real‐life situations, which cannot be given in terms of crisp values (Hsu et al, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic idea of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is to construct the problem hierarchically according to the goal of decision-making (as shown in figure 2). The target level is the highest one, the middle level is the criterion level, and the bottom level is the solution level [8,9].…”
Section: B Determination Of Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic idea of the AHP is to build the problem hierarchically based on the decision goal (as is shown in Figure 4). The highest level is the target level, several intermediate levels are the criterion level, and the bottom level is the various options selected for solving the problem, which is called the plan level [24,25]. The weights of indexes are determined by AHP as follows:…”
Section: The Calculation Of Weights For Commonality Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%