Deriving an Empirical Structure of Personality Pathology for DSM-5

Krueger, Robert F.; Eaton, Nicholas R.; Clark, Lee Anna; Watson, David; Markon, Kristian E.; Derringer, Jaime; Skodol, Andrew E.; Livesley, W. John

doi:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.170

Cited by 268 publications

(254 citation statements)

References 69 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

234

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Esto respalda la consistencia teórica e incluso práctica, apoyando el argumento de ser un modelo no solo que puede ser de valor teórico, sino también aplicativo. Esta es una de las razones por la que actualmente los 5GF complementan conceptualmente a uno de los manuales diagnósticos más usados en el mundo: el DSM-5 (Krueger et al, 2011), pues la replicabilidad internacional de sus hallazgos lo hace un modelo fiable.…”

Section: Modelo De Los Cinco Grandes Factoresunclassified

Big Five Inventory en Universitarios Peruanos: Resultados Preliminares de su Validación

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo examinar la estructura interna del Big Five Inventory (BFI) en una muestra no probabilística incidental de 332 estudiantes entre 16 y 48 años (M = 20,39) de una universidad privada de Lima Metropolitana, Perú (82,83% mujeres). Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio mediante el método de mínimos cuadrados no ponderados y rotación procrusteana oblicua con una matriz completamente especificada. También se calcularon las correlaciones lineales de Pearson entre los factores. La estructura factorial obtenida del BFI fue semejante a la estructura de la versión original de 44 ítems, aunque 7 ítems fueron eliminados. La versión de 37 ítems mostró buenos índices de consistencia interna, evaluada por alfa ordinal, omega y H. En conclusión, el BFI presenta indicadores psicométricos favorables que posibilitarían su uso en evaluaciones de grupo e investigación básica.Palabras clave: cinco grandes factores, BFI, rotación procrusteana, estudiantes universitarios, validez, consistencia internaThe aim of this study was to examine the internal structure of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) in a nonprobability sample of 332 students (82.83% women) aged between 16 and 48 years (M = 20,39) who attended a private university in Metropolitan Lima, Peru. An exploratory factor analysis was performed using unweighted least squares and oblique Procrustes rotation with fully specified target matrix. In addition, the linear Pearson correlations between the factors were calculated. The BFI was found to have a factor structure similar to that of the original test, although 7 items were removed. The 37-items version displayed good internal consistency according to ordinal alpha, omega, and H. In conclusion, the BFI exhibits favorable psychometric indicators that suggest that it can be used in group evaluations and basic research.Keywords: big five, BFI, Procrustes rotation, college students, validity, internal consistency Modelo de los Cinco Grandes FactoresDesde que fue propuesto como una explicación organizada y parsimoniosa de la personalidad, el modelo de los cinco grandes factores (5GF) es quizá el más usado a nivel mundial para el estudio científico de la personalidad (Goldberg, 1990). Esto se respalda con los trabajos que corroboran su carácter intercultural a nivel sustantivo (McCrae & Terracciano, 2005;Schmitt, Allik, McCrae & Benet-Martínez, 2007; Yamagata et al., 2006) e, incluso, en relación a estilos de respuesta, como el aquiescente (Rammstedt, Kemper & Borg, 2013). Sin embargo, aunque los resultados de algunos estudios sean divergentes a la premisa de replicabilidad intercultural (Fetvadjiev & van der Vijver, 2015;Gurven, von Rueden, Massenkoff, Kaplan & Lero Vie, 2013;Schmitt et al., 2007) La correspondencia relativa a este artículo debe ser dirigida a

show abstract

Section: Modelo De Los Cinco Grandes Factoresunclassified

Big Five Inventory en Universitarios Peruanos: Resultados Preliminares de su Validación

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lanier et al also indicate, however, that the authors of the DSM-5 dimensional trait model disavow some of the connection with the FFM; more specifically, that compulsivity is Clin Soc Work J (2013) 41:163-167 165 not a maladaptive variant of conscientiousness and oddity or peculiarity is not a maladaptive of openness (Clark and Krueger 2010;Krueger et al 2011). The rationale for this position is unclear, as there is a considerable body of empirical research that supports the relationship of compulsivity to conscientiousness and oddity to openness (Widiger 2011).…”

Section: Dimensional Trait Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes in the Conceptualization of Personality Disorder: The DSM-5 Debacle

Widiger

2012

Clin Soc Work J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The PSY-5 has demonstrated adequate reliability and validity. 56 Krueger et al 54 cited the PSY-5 as contributing to the DSM-5 PD Work Group's trait model.…”

Section: Psy-5mentioning

confidence: 99%

A (Re)-Evaluation of the Symptom Structure of Borderline Personality Disorder

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Despite evidence of significant symptom heterogeneity and excessive diagnostic comorbidity, many contend that borderline personality disorder (BPD) is unidimensional, an assumption that rests primarily on results from factor analytic investigations of BPD symptom criteria. We note several limitations in the literature and argue that the symptom structure of BPD can be best clarified by using both factor analytic techniques and examining the BPD symptom dimensions in relation to external criteria (that is, personality traits). Our goals were to: examine if the symptoms of BPD are best conceptualized as unidimensional or multidimensional, and determine the extent to which personality traits account for any symptom dimensions that underlie BPD. Method:All published structural models of the BPD symptom criteria were identified and tested for statistical fit using confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 373 patients who had completed the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Axis II Personality Questionnaire BPD scale. Dimensions from the best fitting model were examined in relation to traits from the Five-Factor Model (FFM) and the Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) using correlational and regression analyses.Results: Sanislow's 3-factor model, containing affect dysregulation, behavioural dysregulation, and disturbed relations symptom dimensions, provided the best fit; the unidimensional model produced the worst. The symptom dimensions of the 3-factor model were differentiable from one another and had unique associations with the FFM and PSY-5 personality traits.

show abstract

Deriving an Empirical Structure of Personality Pathology for DSM-5

Cited by 268 publications

References 69 publications

Big Five Inventory en Universitarios Peruanos: Resultados Preliminares de su Validación

Big Five Inventory en Universitarios Peruanos: Resultados Preliminares de su Validación

Changes in the Conceptualization of Personality Disorder: The DSM-5 Debacle

A (Re)-Evaluation of the Symptom Structure of Borderline Personality Disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About