1992
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.45.6130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of the critical angle for Mach reflection for strong shock waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical simulations with different values of γ and the Mach number M made it possible to test analytical formulae that translate α C to γ, and we found that the relatively simple formula from Courant & Friedrichs (1948) reproduces the numerical results with approximately a 5% error as long as γ 1.4. At smaller values of γ, only the more complex analytic formula for α C from De Rosa et al (1992) is consistent with the simulations. Our best estimate for the effective γ of the shocked foam is ∼ 1.42.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Numerical simulations with different values of γ and the Mach number M made it possible to test analytical formulae that translate α C to γ, and we found that the relatively simple formula from Courant & Friedrichs (1948) reproduces the numerical results with approximately a 5% error as long as γ 1.4. At smaller values of γ, only the more complex analytic formula for α C from De Rosa et al (1992) is consistent with the simulations. Our best estimate for the effective γ of the shocked foam is ∼ 1.42.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…There is a critical angle, depending on the shock wave Mach number, for the onset of the Mach wave. De Rosa et al [46] calculated this critical angle in 1992, obtaining values in excellent agreement with the experimental results obtained in the interaction of identical laser-generated spherical shock waves in gas [47,48].…”
Section: Reflection and Interaction Of Shock Wavessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A more detailed derivation of this critical angle was done by De Rosa et al [20] and gives a more accurate equation.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%