2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of numerical values for the World Health Organization guidelines for recreational waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
64
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Retail and food manufacturers, plus a variety of other agencies, use microbiological standards based on the presence or absence of indicator organisms, identification of which alerts the agency to a potential health risk from the medium monitored (132,244,245). These standards also incorporate overall counts of nonpathogenic flora, because the organisms of interest are widely spread throughout time and space (129).…”
Section: Microbiological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retail and food manufacturers, plus a variety of other agencies, use microbiological standards based on the presence or absence of indicator organisms, identification of which alerts the agency to a potential health risk from the medium monitored (132,244,245). These standards also incorporate overall counts of nonpathogenic flora, because the organisms of interest are widely spread throughout time and space (129).…”
Section: Microbiological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the fact that enterococci have been proved to be the most reliable predictors of health risk in recreational waters (Kay et al 1994(Kay et al , 2004Mariñ o et al 1995a;Borrego & Mariñ o 1998), it is necessary to carry out more studies to improve the detection and enumeration of enterococci in natural waters using the defined substrate-based procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it also 99 generates controversy across the scientific, regulatory and policy communities with regular 100 debates being driven by scepticism of whether: (i) E. coli is a suitable faecal indicator 101 organism (FIO) to assess recent faecal pollution (Wu et al, 2011), (ii) the directive is suitably 102 protective of human health (Langford et al, 2000;Kay et al, 2004), and, more recently, (iii) 103 the methods currently used to determine microbial water quality at bathing beaches are fit for 104 purpose . However, it is important to note that microbial water quality testing at designated bathing 131 waters in the EU can serve two separate purposes.…”
Section: The Debate 96mentioning
confidence: 99%