Der Einfluß von Zellulase anf die Silierung von Eiweißreichen Futterstoffen

Nehring, K.; Friedel, K.; Heinz, Dorit

doi:10.1080/17450398309426923

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These findings are in agreement with those of Henderson and McDonald (1977), Nehring et al (1983) and Seale et al (1986).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 83%

“…Research has already shown that different cellulolytic preparations vary markedly in their ability to solubilize cell-wall material. This ability depends on the producer micro-organisms of the enzymes (Autrey et al 1975, McDonald 1977, Vaisto et al 1978) and the rate of the application of the enzymes (Autrey et al 1975, Nehring et al 1983). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The effect of inoculants and cellulase on the fermentation and microbiological composition of grass silage: I Biochemical changes in the silages

Rauramaa

Setälä

Moisio

et al. 1987

AFSci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The effect of the inoculation and the adding of the cellulase enzyme on the fermentation of sugar-rich, direct cut grass were studied. The control silages were made by using AIV II solution and no additives. The silages were prepared from the first cut on a farm scale in the summer of 1985.Generally all four silages were organoleptically good. The results showed only minor differences in the fermentation between untreated and inoculated or enzyme silages. The quality of fermentation, however, was improved in inoculated and enzyme silages. The quality further improved by using the AIV II solution. This was supported by the changes in the pH, ammonia, buffering capacity, redox potential, temperature and finally by a better digestibility of organic matter.

show abstract

“…These findings are in agreement with those of Henderson and McDonald (1977), Nehring et al (1983) and Seale et al (1986).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 83%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of inoculants and cellulase on the fermentation and microbiological composition of grass silage: I Biochemical changes in the silages

Rauramaa

Setälä

Moisio

et al. 1987

AFSci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…11. The same positive effect of enzymes has been found also in other experiments (Autrey et al 1975, Henderson and McDonald 1977, Nehring et al 1983, Hendersson et al 1987, Merry and Braithwaite 1987. Applied in conjunction with FA, enzymes may have no effect on the conversion of WSC to fermentation acids and thus on pH (Henderson and McDonald 1977, Vaisto et al 1978, Brolly 1986.…”

Section: The Fermentation Quality Of the Silagessupporting

confidence: 81%

The effect of cell wall degrading enzymes on the preservation of grass and on the silage intake and digestibility in sheep

Jaakkola

1990

AFSci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two experiments were carried out to study the effects of cell wall degrading enzymes as silage additive. A primary growth of timothy was cut with a mower and picked up with a precision-chop forage harvester in Exp. I (early cut), and harvested as direct-cut with a precision-chop harvester in Exp. II (late cut). The additive treatments were in Exp. I: 1) unwilted formic acid (FA) applied as AIV II (4.5 l/t), 2) wilted untreated, 3) wilted FA (4 l/t), 4) wilted enzyme A (glucose oxidase (GO) + hemicellulase (HC) 150 ml/t + cellulase (C) 200 ml/t), 5) wilted enzyme B (HC 150 ml/t + C 200 ml/t); and in Exp. II: 1) untreated, 2) FA (4 l/t), 3) E200 (C 200 ml/t + GO), 4) E400 (C 400 ml/t + GO), 5) E800 (C 800 ml/t + GO). The rate of application of GO was 50 000 IU/t. The silages were ensiled in pilot scale silos (3 m3) and the voluntary intake and digestibility in sheep were determined in two experiments designed as a 5 x 5 Latin square. The use of enzymes decreased the fibre content of silages, mainly the cellulose fraction, as compared with FA and untreated silages. Enzyme silages were well preserved with a low pH (3.93—4.15), moderate ammonia N (72—119 g/kg total N) and no butyric acid. As compared with untreated silages (mean pH 4.6, ammonia N 131) the preservation was improved. The FA silages were also well preserved (pH 4.0, ammonia N 57) with more restricted fermentation than enzyme silages. FA and especially higher levels of enzymes increased the amount of effluent. In Exp. I, the digestibilities of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and crude fibre were not significantly (P>0.05) affected by the silage treatment. In Exp. II, the digestibility of DM and OM decreased linearly (P

show abstract

Enzyme assisted ensiling of alfalfa with enzymes by solid substrate fermentation

Schmidt¹,

Szakács²,

Cenkvári³

et al. 2001

Bioresource Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Der Einfluß von Zellulase anf die Silierung von Eiweißreichen Futterstoffen

Cited by 5 publications

References 2 publications

The effect of inoculants and cellulase on the fermentation and microbiological composition of grass silage: I Biochemical changes in the silages

The effect of inoculants and cellulase on the fermentation and microbiological composition of grass silage: I Biochemical changes in the silages

The effect of cell wall degrading enzymes on the preservation of grass and on the silage intake and digestibility in sheep

Enzyme assisted ensiling of alfalfa with enzymes by solid substrate fermentation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About