1959
DOI: 10.1007/bf02049450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Einfluß verschiedener Pharmaka auf die Verteilung eines markierten Endotoxins im Organismus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1959
1959
1963
1963

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of a radioactive marker is of crucial importance for in viva studies on uptake and subsequent distribution of endotoxin, l~dioactive labels such as CrS~Cl8 and ps~ were not employed here but the results of others (7,9,11,12,14) have shown that these labels, presumably with endotoxin attached, are removed more rapidly from plasma than is endotoxin tagged with NasCrSO4 (reference 3 together with the present report). No evidence is available to show that the Cr51C13 label is fixed onto the endotoxin either before or after its administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of a radioactive marker is of crucial importance for in viva studies on uptake and subsequent distribution of endotoxin, l~dioactive labels such as CrS~Cl8 and ps~ were not employed here but the results of others (7,9,11,12,14) have shown that these labels, presumably with endotoxin attached, are removed more rapidly from plasma than is endotoxin tagged with NasCrSO4 (reference 3 together with the present report). No evidence is available to show that the Cr51C13 label is fixed onto the endotoxin either before or after its administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…No evidence is available to show that the Cr51C13 label is fixed onto the endotoxin either before or after its administration. That the difference between the in dvo distribution of endotoxinbound CrSlC18 and free CrS~C18 indicates that the label remains associated with the endotoxin in the former case, is not necessarily a valid assumption (3,7,9). For example, if in dvo liberated chromium is not free but instead attached to a small dialyzable molecule (10), its subsequent distribution may be changed appreciably from that of the free label alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%