1952
DOI: 10.1007/bf01912403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Druck in seiner Bedeutung für das Wachstum submerser Wasserpflanzen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
1
1

Year Published

1963
1963
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence to suggest that the depth distribution of the vascular plants, unlike the more primitive ones, is confined to depths less than 10 m (Maristo 1941, Gessner 1961, Hutchinson 1975, Wetzel 1975. This has been supported by some oft-quoted experimental studies which reported that plants grew poorly when subjected to pressures equal to or exceeding those at maximum depth (Gessner 1952, Ferling 1957.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is evidence to suggest that the depth distribution of the vascular plants, unlike the more primitive ones, is confined to depths less than 10 m (Maristo 1941, Gessner 1961, Hutchinson 1975, Wetzel 1975. This has been supported by some oft-quoted experimental studies which reported that plants grew poorly when subjected to pressures equal to or exceeding those at maximum depth (Gessner 1952, Ferling 1957.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Short experimental periods tend to emphasize the shock effect. The differences due to elevating the pressure are reported as being much more dramatic in Hippuris vulgaris L. after one week than those after 60 days in Cabomba aquatica and Myriophyllum brasiliense (Gessner 1952). Other factors, however, may also reduce the differences in growth after long periods in a limited environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, under changing conditions it might be beneficial to submerged plants to register water depth and to regulate shoot elongation accordingly. Since hydrostatic pressure increases and light intensity decreases with water depth (Gessner, 1952;Dale, 1984), we investigated the influence of these two factors on underwater shoot elongation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants tended to elongate more in deeper water during the first week, but this was usually non-significant (Table 3). Until now, studies on the effects of hydrostatic pressure on plant growth (Gessner, 1952;Ferling, 1957;Dale, 1981Dale, . 1984 have mostly been made usmg aquatic species, and were aimed at explaining the depth distribution of these species in the field by investigating their tolerance to very high hydrostatic pressures, with effects found only at pressures similar to water depths of 5 m or more, which exceed tbe maximum depths naturally occupied by the plants under study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%