2001
DOI: 10.1515/9783110886641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moraux held that Boethius and Ammonius owe their information to Porphyry, who in turn quoted from Alexander; and that Alexander, being motivated to bring clarity out of the confusion, selected from Herminus and Aspasius the interpretations with which he disagreed, preserving at the same time from Aspasius some with which he agreed. 247 The inference is drawn from Boethius' opening words, 248 and it carries some intrinsic probability. It should be kept in mind, however, that Boethius implicitly attributes precisely the same motivation to Porphyry, 249 so that allowance must therefore be made for his intervention and control over evidence as well.…”
Section: Commentary Structure and Prolegomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moraux held that Boethius and Ammonius owe their information to Porphyry, who in turn quoted from Alexander; and that Alexander, being motivated to bring clarity out of the confusion, selected from Herminus and Aspasius the interpretations with which he disagreed, preserving at the same time from Aspasius some with which he agreed. 247 The inference is drawn from Boethius' opening words, 248 and it carries some intrinsic probability. It should be kept in mind, however, that Boethius implicitly attributes precisely the same motivation to Porphyry, 249 so that allowance must therefore be made for his intervention and control over evidence as well.…”
Section: Commentary Structure and Prolegomenamentioning
confidence: 99%