2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(01)00073-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth-related variation in conductivity to study cover-zone concrete during wetting and drying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both systems allow discretised electrical measurements to be taken within the concrete cover-zone, although the electrode geometry and layout is significantly different in both systems. The current work focuses on the covercrete electrode array used and detailed in previous laboratorybased studies [1,2]. In summary, the sensor comprises 10 electrode pairs mounted on a small plexiglas former.…”
Section: Covercrete Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both systems allow discretised electrical measurements to be taken within the concrete cover-zone, although the electrode geometry and layout is significantly different in both systems. The current work focuses on the covercrete electrode array used and detailed in previous laboratorybased studies [1,2]. In summary, the sensor comprises 10 electrode pairs mounted on a small plexiglas former.…”
Section: Covercrete Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results obtained by Abdul Razak et al (2004), Chan and Ji (1999) and McCarter and Watson (1997) using a variety of test methods including electrical conduction measurements, ISAT and the water absorption test detailed in BS 1881-122 (BSI, 2011 all found that the use of silica fume (SF) additions reduces the sorptivity of concrete when compared with plain OPC concrete. However, the results of tests on mixes containing pulverised fly ash (pfa) and ground granulated blastfurnace slag (GGBS) are sometimes contradictory when compared with each other or plain OPC concrete, perhaps because of differences in Unfortunately, the results of these experiments cannot be used to model chloride ingress in any meaningful way and hence estimate the depth of concrete cover needed to prevent corrosion in structures exposed to cyclic wet-dry chloride environments because (a) the absorbing solution used is normally water, which behaves somewhat differently to salt solution because of factors such as pore blocking due to chloride binding and/or crystallisation of chloride salts (Chrisp et al, 2002), and differences in the densities of the two liquids (Emerson and Butler, 1997) (b) in many cases the moisture content of test specimens is unlikely to be representative of field conditions and this can significantly affect sorptivity (Arya et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate electrical measurements within the cover-zone, the Authors have modified a multi-electrode array (McCarter et al, 1995;Chrisp et al, 2002) which is embedded within concrete specimens at the time of casting. The array allows monitoring of the spatial distribution of both electrical resistance and temperature within the cover region.…”
Section: Embedded Electrode Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%