“…Using N ϭN 2 ϭ2.275, ϭ880 nm, d 32 ϭ12.8 pm V Ϫ1 , 12 dϭ1, hϭ1, Qϭ1, and ⌫ϭ0.026 m Ϫ2 , we calculate a normalized conversion efficiency of ϭ140% W Ϫ1 cm Ϫ2 . If we consider ͑i͒ hϭ0.24 due to the waveguide loss coefficients of ␣ 2 ϭ16 dB cm Ϫ1 and ␣ ϭ3 dB cm Ϫ1 , ͑ii͒ dϭ0.7 because these waveguides are not annealed and repoled, 13 and ͑iii͒ Qϭ0.65 because the conversion efficiency of the substrate KNbO 3 crystal is only 2.0% W Ϫ1 cm Ϫ1 compared to the maximum value of 3.1% W Ϫ1 cm Ϫ1 , then we expect a theoretical conversion efficiency of •h•L 2 ϭ5.1% W Ϫ1 (15% W Ϫ1 cm Ϫ2 ) for this channel waveguide. The remaining difference of about 35% between the calculated and measured conversion efficiency is ascribed to the inhomogeneity in the waveguide which is also responsible for the broadening of the wavelength tuning curve mentioned above.…”