2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2020.104767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth and intensity of the sulfate-methane transition zone control sedimentary molybdenum and uranium sequestration in a eutrophic low-salinity setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During each campaign, the first core was used for bottomwater and pore-water sampling using Rhizons™ at 2 cm vertical resolution. The samples were collected into 10 mL polyethylene syringes through pre-drilled holes (diameter 4 mm; e.g., Jokinen et al, 2020) immediately after core retrieval. Within a few hours after retrieval, all water samples were transferred into 15 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes and acidified to 1 M HNO 3 for elemental analyses.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During each campaign, the first core was used for bottomwater and pore-water sampling using Rhizons™ at 2 cm vertical resolution. The samples were collected into 10 mL polyethylene syringes through pre-drilled holes (diameter 4 mm; e.g., Jokinen et al, 2020) immediately after core retrieval. Within a few hours after retrieval, all water samples were transferred into 15 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes and acidified to 1 M HNO 3 for elemental analyses.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) (Scott & Lyons, 2012); when dissolved sulfide concentration exceeds a threshold of ∼11 μM, MoO 4 2− may be quantitatively transformed to particle-reactive MoS 4 2− (Erickson & Helz, 2000), resulting in Mo enrichment in the zone of intense SR-AOM (Jokinen et al, 2020). It is noted that sedimentary Mo enrichment is sensitive to sulfidic condition of porewater or bottom water and specific depositional/diagenetic processes involving the mechanisms of particulate Mo delivery to the sediments, and Mo recycling and burial in the sediments (Eroglu et al, 2020;Scholz et al, 2017Scholz et al, , 2018Scott & Lyons, 2012).…”
Section: Ch4 + So 2−mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the sulfide is precipitated by reaction with dissolved Fe 2+ and/or Fe(III) oxides, initially as metastable Fe sulfides such as FeS and Fe 3 S 4 but eventually as thermodynamically stable pyrite (FeS 2 ) (Borowski et al., 2013; Peketi et al., 2012). In the sulfidic porewater conditions created by the SR‐AOM, MoO 4 2− can be readily transformed to oxythiomolybdates (MoO 4‐x S x 2− ) (Scott & Lyons, 2012); when dissolved sulfide concentration exceeds a threshold of ∼11 μM, MoO 4 2− may be quantitatively transformed to particle‐reactive MoS 4 2− (Erickson & Helz, 2000), resulting in Mo enrichment in the zone of intense SR‐AOM (Jokinen et al., 2020). It is noted that sedimentary Mo enrichment is sensitive to sulfidic condition of porewater or bottom water and specific depositional/diagenetic processes involving the mechanisms of particulate Mo delivery to the sediments, and Mo recycling and burial in the sediments (Eroglu et al., 2020; Scholz et al., 2017, 2018; Scott & Lyons, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for GF 117 are published in Brinkmann et al (2022), and the TE sampling procedure-used for both sites-outlined therein. In short, Rhizons™ were used to collect water samples into 10-ml polyethylene syringes (Jokinen et al, 2020) at 2-cm resolution, which were subsequently transferred into centrifuge tubes and acidified (1 M HNO 3 ). The acidified BW and PW samples were analyzed for elemental concentrations of Mn, iron (Fe), sulfur (S), and Ca by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; Thermo Scientific iCAP 6000; Helsinki University, Ecosystems and Environment Research Program) (Brinkmann et al, 2022).…”
Section: Site Descriptions and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%