1996
DOI: 10.1097/00019442-199622430-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depressive Symptoms Among Community-Dwelling Oldest-Old Residents in Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for origin, which is an Israeli-bound characteristic, participants born in Israel presented a lower level of depressive symptoms relative to immigrants from the Middle East or North Africa and the former Soviet Union, as well as to Arab Israelis. This finding may reflect differences in access to resources and social positions [30, 47]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for origin, which is an Israeli-bound characteristic, participants born in Israel presented a lower level of depressive symptoms relative to immigrants from the Middle East or North Africa and the former Soviet Union, as well as to Arab Israelis. This finding may reflect differences in access to resources and social positions [30, 47]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores range from a low of 0 to a high of 60. The version we used asked for frequency of each depressive symptom in the past month instead of in the past week (Ruskin et al, 1996). Participants who did not complete at least 15 of the 20 items were excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. depressive symptoms, measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (Radloff 1977), scored as the mean rating of experiencing 20 symptoms in the past month on a scale of 0 (not at all), 1 (sometimes), 2 (most of the time), and 3 (almost every day) (Cronbach's α for the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in the Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Aging Study was .88; Ruskin et al 1996); 2. cognitive impairment, measured using a memory-orientation-concentration scale (Katzman et al 1983) and defined by collapsing the raw score of a respondent's errors into a three-category scale of 0 to 8 errors (no impairment), 9 to 19 errors (some impairment), and 20 to 28 errors (full impairment); 3. cognitive vitality, consisting of an eight-item index representing tasks with cognitive components: having no problem identifying people; being able to write or use small objects; reading a newspaper often; attending movies, restaurants, concerts, or theater often; writing letters often; having no difficulty managing finances; having no difficulty using the telephone; and reported age at last birthday matching official age within one year (Walter-Ginzburg et al 2005) (scored as the mean of the 0 [no] and 1 [yes] response categories, with a higher score indicating higher vitality, ranging from 0 to 1); and 4. current life evaluation, measured by the answer to the question "Is your life today: (1) very difficult, (2) difficult, (3) pretty good, or (4) good? "…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%