The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depression in advanced cancer – Assessment challenges and associations with disease load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Palliative care guidelines define the psychiatric classification systems as the clinical standard (11,14). The diagnostic algorithm might however reduce overestimation of MDE by the overlapping somatic depressive and cancer symptoms (75). The prevalence rate of MDE measured by PHQ-9 in the present study was 13.7%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Palliative care guidelines define the psychiatric classification systems as the clinical standard (11,14). The diagnostic algorithm might however reduce overestimation of MDE by the overlapping somatic depressive and cancer symptoms (75). The prevalence rate of MDE measured by PHQ-9 in the present study was 13.7%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…examined psychiatric symptoms in 969 palliative patients across Europe using the PHQ-9. They found a total rate of 45.3% for any depressive disorder [26]. This might be explained by the fact that self-report instruments generally show higher depression rates or also by the small sample size of consecutive patients within one clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In palliative care, in particular, the need to have a clear-cut framework to assess depression has frequently been balanced with the need to focus on clinical utility and evaluation of symptoms and depressive syndromes rather than on a specific diagnosis, such as major depression [17, 18]. However, in a recent study involving 969 patients with advanced cancer within the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative-Computer Symptom Assessment Study (EPCRC-CSA) [19••], it has been shown that the prevalence of depression changed according to the scoring-methods used, specifically inclusive (algorithm scoring including the somatic symptom-criteria, rate 13.7%), exclusive (algorithm scoring excluding the somatic symptom-criteria, rate 14.9%), and sum-score (sum of all symptoms of the Patient Health Questionnaire cut-off ≥8, rate 45.3%). The scoring-method, not excluding somatic symptoms, had the greatest effect on assessment outcomes, since depression was significantly associated with pain and lower performance status.…”
Section: Diagnostic Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%