Depression Coping Self-Efficacy as a Predictor of Relapse 1 and 2 Years Following Psychiatric Hospital-Based Treatment

Tucker, Sharon; Brust, Susan; Pierce, Pamela; Fristedt, Carol; Pankratz, V. Shane

doi:10.1891/088971804780957036

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These findings held up when 26 of the patients whose charts were reviewed completed the DCSES and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) 2 years later. Although scores were higher on both scales at 2 years, patient scores remained above the cut off on the CESD and did not differ by treatment group (day hospital or inpatient; Tucker et al, 2004).…”

Section: Validation Studiesmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…In a recent retrospective assessment of the relationship between the DCSES and rehospitalization researchers compared post-treatment depressive symptom and DCSES scores with 2 year follow-up scores, examined DCSES score as a predictor of post-treatment health care visit frequency, and examined differences in 2-year depressive symptoms and DCSES scores between original treatment groups (Tucker, Brust, Pierce, Fristedt, & Pankratz, 2004). Forty-nine health records were reviewed at 1-year post-discharge, and it was found that DCSES scores at discharge were associated with frequencies and types of health care visits in the ensuing year.…”

Section: Validation Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The remaining 99 patients consented to participate and completed the research measures at admission and discharge. Based on prior research (Tucker et al, 2002(Tucker et al, , 2004, an effect size of .70 was estimated for power analysis. Given a sample size of 99, an estimated effect size of .70, and an alpha level of .05, the power to detect effects was > .90.…”

Section: Samplementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Predictive validity of the Depression Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (DCSES)

Perraud¹,

Fogg²,

Kopytko³

et al. 2006

Res. Nurs. Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Depression Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (DCSES) was developed to measure depressed individuals' confidence in their ability to follow treatment recommendations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the DCSES as a unidimensional measure of depression coping self-efficacy. Data were collected from depressed psychiatric inpatients at admission and discharge (n = 99), and 6-8 weeks post-discharge (n = 75). Exploratory factor analysis yielded a single factor solution accounting for 48.8% of the variance with an eigenvalue of 12.7. DCSES scores at discharge were related to self-reported levels of functional impairment (FI), depression symptom distress, and suicidal ideation (SI), and predicted rehospitalization 6-8 weeks later. Patients with lower DCSES scores at discharge showed less improvement in depression coping self-efficacy from admission to discharge.

show abstract

Section: Validation Studiesmentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: Validation Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Samplementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Predictive validity of the Depression Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (DCSES)

Perraud¹,

Fogg²,

Kopytko³

et al. 2006

Res. Nurs. Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since youth depression itself and the diversity of its associated problems (i.e., suicidal behavior; poor school achievement; family conflict; increase mental health care costs; and increase risk for substance use, anxiety, and conduct disorders) are a current scientific and serious public concern, the development of a self-report measure to assess the specific aspects of selfefficacy related to Puerto Rican adolescents' depression seems essential. This is especially true since it has been found that improved self-efficacy results in decreased depression and that higher SED scores predict lower posttreatment and follow-up depressive symptoms and an increased general functioning (Kavanagh & Wilson, 1989;Perraud, Fogg, Kopytko, & Gross, 2006;Tucker, Brust, Pierce, Fristedt, & Pankratz, 2004;Tucker et al, 2002).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Factor Structure of the Escala de Autoeficacia para la Depresión en Adolescentes (EADA)

Díaz-Santos

Cumba‐Avilés

Bernal

et al. 2011

Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current concept and measures of self-efficacy for depression in adolescents do not consider developmental and cultural aspects essential to understand and assess this construct in Latino youth. We examined the factor structure of the Escala de Autoeficacia para la Depresión en Adolescentes (EADA): a Spanish instrument designed to assess this construct as experienced by this population. Participants were 116 Puerto Rican adolescents aged 13 to 17 years who completed the EADA and two other self-report measures. An exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution (Personal Self-Efficacy for Depression and Interpersonal Self-Efficacy for Depression) accounting for 37.57% of the total variance. Results revealed that EADA factors have excellent internal consistency as well as concurrent and construct validity, supporting its adequacy to assess Latino adolescents’ self-efficacy for depression. The conceptual meaning of the factors was consistent with the distinction between aspects of this construct hypothesized to be important among Latino youth.

show abstract

“…‫א‬ (Maddux & Gosselin 2003;Schwarzer 2002;Fuchs & Schwarzer 1994;Stuart et al 1994, O`Leary 1992, Schindler & Körkel 1994Schwarzer & Jerusalem,1989;Sherer & Maddux 1982 (Luszczynska et al, 2005, Maddux, 2003, Schwarzer 2002 (Johann et al , 2003), (Engels et al , 2005) Ħ (Öst et al 2004;Takaki, et al , 2003;Ehlers & Lüer 1996;Senf 1996;Brody et al 2007;Francis et al 2007;Sacco, et al , 2005;Tucker et al 2004, Arnstein 2001Anderson & McLean 1997;Ehlers & Lüer 1996;Zimmer 1996;Connell et al 1994;Hautzinger et al 1994, Schindler & Körkel, 1994de Jong et al 1985) ħ ª ‫א‬ ‫א‬ Khalek, 2000,2007Abdekl-Khalek & Rudwan, 2001Abdekl-Khalek & Al-Damaty, 2003;Abdekl-Khalek & Lester, 2003;Abdekl-Khalek et al , 2004;Abdekl-Khalek, et al , 2006, 2007…”

unclassified

أثر الكفاءة الذاتية في خفض مستوى القلق

Rudwan¹

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

استهدفت الدراسة معرفة العلاقة بين الكفاءة الذاتية والقلق وأثر الكفاءة الذاتية في تعديل مستوى القلق. تم تطبيق مقياس الكفاءة الذاتية العامة لشفارتسر وجيروزيليم (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1989) و مقياس جامعة الكويت للقلق KUAS (Abdel-Khalek, 2000)، على (212) طالباً وطالبة من طلاب كلية العلوم التطبيقية بعبري في سلطنة عمان. بالنسبة للفروق بين الطلاب والطالبات في الكفاءة الذاتية والقلق أشارت النتائج إلى وجود فروق دالة إحصائياً بين الطلاب والطالبات، حيث كان الطلاب أكثر قلقاً وأقل تقديراً لكفاءتهم الذاتية من الطالبات. وأظهر تحليل التباين تناقص مستوى القلق بتزايد درجة الكفاءة الذاتية ووجود فروق دالة في درجة القلق بين مجموعة الكفاءة الذاتية المنخفضة والمتوسطة، والمنخفضة والعالية، في حين لم تسجل فروق دالة في القلق بين مجموعة الكفاءة الذاتية المتوسطة والعالية. وأظهر تحليل الانحدار الخطي البسيط أن للكفاءة الذاتية تأثير في خفض درجة القلق، وأن الكفاءة الذاتية تسهم بمقدار مقبول في التنبؤ بمستوى القلق.

show abstract

Depression Coping Self-Efficacy as a Predictor of Relapse 1 and 2 Years Following Psychiatric Hospital-Based Treatment

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Predictive validity of the Depression Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (DCSES)

Predictive validity of the Depression Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (DCSES)

Factor Structure of the Escala de Autoeficacia para la Depresión en Adolescentes (EADA)

أثر الكفاءة الذاتية في خفض مستوى القلق

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About