2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10582-006-0372-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deposition of teflon-like protective layers in surface discharge at atmospheric pressure

Abstract: Recently the technologies based on atmospheric pressure plasma sources become very promising tool for the control of surface properties of solids while the desirable bulk properties are kept. In this work the surface barrier discharge operated at atmospheric pressure was used for deposition of thin protective hydrophobic films from mixture of nitrogen with C 4 F 8 on the paper substrate. The plasma parameters were investigated by means of optical emission spectroscopy. Surface properties of the deposited thin … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure displays SEM images of cellulose fibres of paperboard. The images show that SF 6 plasma treatment had no effect on the surface morphology of paperboard samples; this is because plasma species usually do not penetrate below 10 nm of the surface . However, at a longer treatment time, such as 600 s for this study, cellulose fibres seem to show a rough surface, which is mainly due to plasma etching.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure displays SEM images of cellulose fibres of paperboard. The images show that SF 6 plasma treatment had no effect on the surface morphology of paperboard samples; this is because plasma species usually do not penetrate below 10 nm of the surface . However, at a longer treatment time, such as 600 s for this study, cellulose fibres seem to show a rough surface, which is mainly due to plasma etching.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The images show that SF 6 plasma treatment had no effect on the surface morphology of paperboard samples; this is because plasma species usually do not penetrate below 10 nm of the surface. 28,31,32 However, at a longer treatment time, such as 600 s for this study, cellulose fibres seem to show a rough surface, which is mainly due to plasma etching. Further surface analysis was conducted by XPS to investigate the number of fluorine atoms on the paper surface as a function of treatment time.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Paperboardmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations