2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00246-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deposition of nitrogen into the North Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies cover the region but do not report estimates specifically for the Baltic Sea or for the surrounding catchment. Hongisto et al (2003) Several modelling studies have specifically addressed the deposition of Nr to the Baltic Sea and surrounding areas (de Leeuw et al 2001(de Leeuw et al , 2003Hertel et al 2002;Schlunzen and Meyer 2007;Bartnicki and Fagerli 2008;Langner et al 2009;Bartnicki et al 2011;Geels et al 2012b). As illustrated in Figs.…”
Section: Modelled Concentrations and Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies cover the region but do not report estimates specifically for the Baltic Sea or for the surrounding catchment. Hongisto et al (2003) Several modelling studies have specifically addressed the deposition of Nr to the Baltic Sea and surrounding areas (de Leeuw et al 2001(de Leeuw et al , 2003Hertel et al 2002;Schlunzen and Meyer 2007;Bartnicki and Fagerli 2008;Langner et al 2009;Bartnicki et al 2011;Geels et al 2012b). As illustrated in Figs.…”
Section: Modelled Concentrations and Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Eulerian approach is powerful and widely used for elucidating the chemical and physical mechanism in the atmosphere, the Lagrangian approach demonstrates key advantages in presenting sub-grid scale process, minimizing numerical diffusion, artificial dilution and computing resources. The Lagrangian approach has been widely adopted in various models in atmospheric ammonia modeling such as the FRAME model (Singles et al, 1998;Kryza et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2011), the TREND model (Asman and van Jaarsveld, 1992;Asman, 2001), the ACDEP model (Hertel et al, 1995Gyldenkoerne et al, 2005;de Leeuw et al, 2003;Skjøth et al, 2002Skjøth et al, , 2004Skjøth et al, , 2011, The TERN model (ApSimon et al, 1994), and the NAME model (Redington and Derwent, 2002). Most existing Lagrangian models for atmospheric ammonia modeling are either box-based models or use a simplified dry chemical scheme.…”
Section: Wen Et Al: Modeling Atmospheric Ammonia and Ammoniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity all point sources were treated as surface sources, which is reasonable for NH 3 emissions. We also incorporated the Models-3 Input/Output Application Programming Interface (IOAPI) (Coats, 2003) into the model to read in emissions fields directly from SMOKE output files.…”
Section: Emissions Datasets and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus areas more than a few hundred km from sources receive most of their N r deposition in precipitation (Bartnicki et al, 2011;de Leeuw et al, 2003;Hertel et al, 2003), except possibly for forests whose aerodynamic roughness maximises dry deposition. Simpson et al (2006) presented calculations of the wet and dry fraction of both oxidised and reduced nitrogen over Europe, calculated with the EMEP MSC-W model for the year 2000.…”
Section: Distribution Between Dry and Wet Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%