2014
DOI: 10.13083/1414-3984.v22n01a02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deposição da Calda de Pulverização Aplicada com Pontas de Jato Plano em Diferentes Partes da Planta de Soja (Glycine max) e Milho (Zea mays)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduction of row spacing increased grain yield by approximately 6.5% and 8.6% for the susceptible cultivar (SYN 1363 RR) and for the resistant cultivar (SYN 1365 RR), respectively, by observing the 0.17 m spacing between rows in relation to the other ones (Table 8 and Table 9). One of the main reasons for ineffective ASR control is associated with the target coverage deficiency by the application of fungicides, especially at the lower portion of the plant (Cunha et al, 2014;Silva et al, 2014;Cunha et al, 2016;Moura et al, 2017, Weber et al, 2017. The control efficacy becomes, therefore, compromised, as fungicides for ASR management, although systemic, are translocated to small distances from the deposition point (Reis et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reduction of row spacing increased grain yield by approximately 6.5% and 8.6% for the susceptible cultivar (SYN 1363 RR) and for the resistant cultivar (SYN 1365 RR), respectively, by observing the 0.17 m spacing between rows in relation to the other ones (Table 8 and Table 9). One of the main reasons for ineffective ASR control is associated with the target coverage deficiency by the application of fungicides, especially at the lower portion of the plant (Cunha et al, 2014;Silva et al, 2014;Cunha et al, 2016;Moura et al, 2017, Weber et al, 2017. The control efficacy becomes, therefore, compromised, as fungicides for ASR management, although systemic, are translocated to small distances from the deposition point (Reis et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From numerous strategies for dealing with ASR, the application of fungicides is a widely used one. In most cases, the uniformity in distribution of the product, provided by the terrestrial and aerial applications, along the soybean canopy, is low (Cunha et al, 2014, Silva et al, 2014. As this is one of the main causes of low efficiency in disease control, strategies that increase the deposition of spray droplets in this canopy layer are necessary (Cunha et al, 2011;Nascimento et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition decreases coverage levels and droplet deposition from the upper to the lower crop strata (Prado et al, 2015;Da Silva et al, 2014;Zaidan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O ajuste deste índice apresenta como limitação a variação de volume vegetativo apresentado pela lavoura de café, que se dá em função de diversos fatores, tais como: idade da planta, desfolha decorrente da colheita (SANTINATO et al, 2014), ataque de pragas e doenças (MATIELLO et al, 2010), realização de podas (FERNANDES et al, 2012), variações sazonais que ocorrem em função da disponibilidade hídrica e variação na temperatura (DaMATTA et al, 2007). Essas variações, principalmente ao longo das estações, resultam em alterações na densidade foliar (BERNI et al, 1999), tendo influencia direta na eficácia das pulverizações, sobre tudo, na penetração, distribuição e deposição da calda (SILVA et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introdução Geralunclassified