Deployment and Adoption of Future Internet Protocols

Eardley, Philip; Kanakakis, Michalis; Κωστόπουλος, Αλέξανδρος; Levä, Tapio; Richardson, Ken; Warma, Henna

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20898-0_10

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, adoptability may be a helpful addition to the CED3 framework, as an output. In recognizing the distinctions between implementation, deployment and adoption, specified by Eardley et al [34] we consider it possible for a defence to be implemented and deployed but not used; and therefore not having the intended impact. Therefore, part of adoptability is the consideration of the factors that encourage the use of a defence, such as the incremental incentives a defence provides to key stakeholders.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Comparative Evaluation of DDoS Defences

Otung

Martin

2022

2022 15th International Conference on Security of Information and Networks (SIN)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

DDoS defence evaluation provides a way to capture the usefulness of defensive solutions to one of the most notorious Internet attacks of our computing generation. An alternative approach to evaluation offers a valuable mechanism by which different DDoS defences can be commensurably and objectively compared. Such a development would not only enable individual organizations to make better informed decisions on which defences to implement but could also aid collaborations to realize global solutions; and reveal insights into aspects requiring further investigation.We present CED3 (pronounced "Seed"), a DDoS defence evaluation framework designed to facilitate the commensurable comparison between DDoS defences in a way that captures their strengths and weaknesses. Firstly, CED3 introduces the notion of true effectiveness, which addresses the problem, identified in the literature, of previously validated defences subsequently being shown to be ineffective when evaluated under different attack conditions. CED3 leverages a structured theoretical analysis process to drive empirical data acquisition in order to enhance consistency, transparency and, ultimately, longevity of evaluation conclusions. Lastly, CED3 introduces the concept of defence maps, which applies the idea of true effectiveness to "scopes" in order to communicate the strengths and weaknesses of defences in a way that allows them to be visually compared.We demonstrate the CED3 framework by applying it to comparatively evaluate three DDoS defences. Using results obtained from extensive simulations in NS-3, we show how the strengths and weaknesses of different defences can be visually compared. We conclude by discussing the merits and limitations of CED3.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Comparative Evaluation of DDoS Defences

Otung

Martin

2022

2022 15th International Conference on Security of Information and Networks (SIN)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One protocol-specific effort was made by Eardley et al [33]. They proposed a model for protocol development suggesting that, prior to the wide-scale deployment, initial easily deployable scenarios should be developed to trigger the diffusion process.…”

Section: Methodologies For Studying Techno-economic Feasibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%