2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependency of lower limb joint reaction forces on femoral version

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, even personalized models have an inherent uncertainty in their muscle geometry representation. Moreover, other sources of inter-subject variability such as bone geometry (e.g., femoral anteversion angle or tibial torsion) may also influence the muscle attachment points and pathway geometry, thereby impacting the predicted KCFs (Kainz et al, 2020;Modenese et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, even personalized models have an inherent uncertainty in their muscle geometry representation. Moreover, other sources of inter-subject variability such as bone geometry (e.g., femoral anteversion angle or tibial torsion) may also influence the muscle attachment points and pathway geometry, thereby impacting the predicted KCFs (Kainz et al, 2020;Modenese et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to mention that our probabilistic approach did not account for inter-subject variability of bone geometry. Such variations can impact the 3D pathways of the muscles and thereby the joint contact force estimation (Kainz et al, 2020;Modenese et al, 2021). More importantly, we only used SO to solve the muscle redundancy problem through minimizing the sum of the squared muscle activation levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, due to the reduced number of markers on the foot segment, the motions of the ankle joint complex were simplified by neglecting subtalar inversion and eversion, which could affect the prediction of muscle activations ( Jinha et al, 2006 ). Additionally, bone morphology variability in the transversal and frontal planes could also affect the prediction of muscle activations and forces ( Passmore et al, 2018 ; Kainz et al, 2020 ; Martelli et al, 2020 ; De Pieri et al, 2021 ; Modenese et al, 2021 ; Veerkamp et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, this study attempted to approximate some aspect of personalisation in the mGen model, adapting the model to use the knee axis orientation defined with the KAD. An alternative approach of deforming the generic model using clinical measures of femoral anteversion has been proposed [36][37][38]; however, given that this was a retrospective study, these metrics were not available for most participants and control data and thus could not be implemented. It is also recognised that using the consensus clinical judgement with no gait analysis metrics input as a proxy gold standard is by nature subjective, and this may have introduced additional error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%