Musculoskeletal models represent a powerful tool to gain knowledge on the internal forces acting at the joint level in a non-invasive way. However, these models can present some errors associated with the level of detail in their geometrical representation. For this reason, a thorough validation is necessary to prove the reliability of their predictions. This study documents the development of a generic musculoskeletal model and proposes a working logic and simulation techniques for identifying specific model features in need of refinement; as well as providing a quantitative validation for the prediction of hip contact forces (HCF). The model, implemented in the AnyBody Modeling System and based on the cadaveric dataset TLEM 2.0, was scaled to match the anthropometry of a patient fitted with an instrumented hip implant and to reproduce gait kinematics based on motion capture data. The relative contribution of individual muscle elements to the HCF and joint moments was analyzed to identify critical geometries, which were then compared to muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and, in case of inconsistencies, were modified to better match the volumetric scans. The predicted HCF showed good agreement with the overall trend and timing of the measured HCF from the instrumented prosthesis. The average root mean square error (RMSE), calculated for the total HCF was found to be 0.298*BW. Refining the geometries of the muscles thus identified reduced RMSE on HCF magnitudes by 17% (from 0.359*BW to 0.298*BW) over the whole gait cycle. The detailed study of individual muscle contributions to the HCF succeeded in identifying muscles with incorrect anatomy, which would have been difficult to intuitively identify otherwise. Despite a certain residual over-prediction of the final hip contact forces in the stance phase, a satisfactory level of geometrical accuracy of muscle paths has been achieved with the refinement of this model.
Keywords:total hip arthroplasty hip contact force functional outcomes activities of daily living biomechanics a b s t r a c t Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants are routinely tested for their tribological performance through regulatory preclinical wear testing (eg, ISO-14242). The standardized loading conditions defined in these tests consist of simplified waveforms, which do not specifically represent in vivo loads in different groups of patients. The aim of this study is to investigate, through musculoskeletal modeling, patient-specific and activity-related variation in hip contact forces (HCFs) in a large cohort of THA patients during common activities of daily living (ADLs). Methods: A total of 132 THA patients participated in a motion-capture analysis while performing different ADLs, including walk, fast walk, stair ascent, and descent (locomotor); sit to stand, stand to sit, squat, and lunge (nonlocomotor). HCFs were then calculated using the AnyBody Modeling System and qualitatively compared across all activities. The influence of gender on HCFs was analyzed through statistical parametric mapping analysis. Results: Systematic differences were found in HCF magnitudes and individual components in both locomotor and nonlocomotor ADLs. The qualitative analysis of the ADLs revealed a large range and a large variability in forces experienced at the hip during different activities. Significant differences in the 3dimensional loading patterns were observed between males and females across most activities. Conclusion: THA patients present a large variability in the forces experienced at the hip joint during their daily life. The interpatient variation might partially explain the heterogeneity observed in implant survival rates. A more extensive preclinical implant testing standard under clinically relevant loading conditions has been advocated to better predict and avoid clinical wear problems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.