1976
DOI: 10.1021/jm00227a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of hydrophobicity of apolar molecules on their molecular volume

Abstract: Cavity size is the primary determinant of the partition coefficient (P) of apolar solutes between octanol and water. Although the energy of cavity formation would be expected to be related to cavity area, older methods of area calculation give a poorer correlation with log P than does volume. Apolar solutes clearly fall into two classes based on their log P/volume relationship, the distinction possibly being whether the solute exposes mostly hydrogen atoms or unbonded electrons.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lipophilicity of a physicochemical characteristic of a compound depends on other characteristics as well, such as polarity, solubility and density (Leo et al 1976). For information on the lipophilic character of carvacrol, Ultee et al (2002) evaluated its partitioning behaviour in a mixture of octanol and water.…”
Section: Neoformans Lm-22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lipophilicity of a physicochemical characteristic of a compound depends on other characteristics as well, such as polarity, solubility and density (Leo et al 1976). For information on the lipophilic character of carvacrol, Ultee et al (2002) evaluated its partitioning behaviour in a mixture of octanol and water.…”
Section: Neoformans Lm-22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the relation ∆G ) ∆H -T∆S, some authors ascribe the hydrophobic effect to an unfavorable enthalpycontrolled process related to the formation of a cavity to host the solute molecule, [9][10][11]14,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] whereas others attribute it to an essentially entropy-governed mechanism emphasizing the ordering or structuring of the water molecules around the apolar solute. Both kinds of explanation generally start from the fact that to dissolve a substance, a cavity of suitable size must first be created within the solvent to accommodate the solute, and this particular process perturbs the three-dimensional net of H-bonds of associated solvents, such as water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 0 is slightly higher for the methyl and chloro derivatives than for PTCA, whereas it is smaller for the fluorosubstituted compound. Taking into account CPK volume values (19), one should expect that A 0 values for PTCA and its substituted derivatives would increase in the following order: -H, -F, -CH 3 , -Cl. Although there is no significant difference in geometrical areas for fluorocarbon amphiphiles in comparison to hydrocarbon amphiphiles bearing the same head group (20), the former are known to occupy a larger area on the water surface than their hydrocarbon analogues (21,22), possibly due to electrostatic repulsion forces between film-forming molecules, caused by the presence of strong electronegative fluorine substituents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%