2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2010.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence between Volumes of Protoplast and Lorica in Lugol-fixed Tintinnid Ciliates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases where the volume was not measured in a study or provided by the authors, estimates were made based upon similar work (Supporting Information Table S1). In tintinnid ciliates, the cell volume was assumed to be 30% of the lorica volume when the former measurement was missing (Gilron and Lynn 1989;Rychert 2011). We used the conversion factor provided by Menden-Deuer and Lessard (2000) to calculate the cell volume from the ciliate carbon content.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where the volume was not measured in a study or provided by the authors, estimates were made based upon similar work (Supporting Information Table S1). In tintinnid ciliates, the cell volume was assumed to be 30% of the lorica volume when the former measurement was missing (Gilron and Lynn 1989;Rychert 2011). We used the conversion factor provided by Menden-Deuer and Lessard (2000) to calculate the cell volume from the ciliate carbon content.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If conversion of units was needed for ciliate cell volume, I used the cell carbon to volume ratio provided by Menden‐Deuer and Lessard (2000) (pg C cell −1 = 0.216 × volume 0.939 ). I converted lorica volume to cell volume for tintinnids, assuming that cells occupied 30% of the lorica (Gilron and Lynn 1989 a ; Rychert 2011). When neither volume, dimensions, or carbon content were reported, I searched the dataset or secondary literature for cell volume of the same species, using preferentially publications by the same authors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth rate estimation for tintinnid ciliates (Tintinnidium sp.) was more complicated, because tintinnid loricae are built by protoplasts and the energy allocated for lorica construction has to be taken into account (Rychert 2011;Agatha et al 2013). First, the carbon content of a tintinnid ciliate (CC, pgC), both lorica and protoplast, was calculated from the volume of lorica using the coe cient 0.053 pgC µm -3 (Verity & Langdon 1984;Seuthe et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%