1978
DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(78)90002-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental materials: 1976 literature review Part I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Micron bar = 4 μm; Original magnification = 5000X would later become microfilled composite resins. 143 These materials contained 35-50% filler by weight with 0.04 μm silica filler particles and prepolymerized resin fillers to compensate for their low filler content. In spite of their excellent handling and final gloss, their physical properties were not ideal for extensive anterior restorations due to their intrinsic low fracture strength.…”
Section: Immediate Dentin Sealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Micron bar = 4 μm; Original magnification = 5000X would later become microfilled composite resins. 143 These materials contained 35-50% filler by weight with 0.04 μm silica filler particles and prepolymerized resin fillers to compensate for their low filler content. In spite of their excellent handling and final gloss, their physical properties were not ideal for extensive anterior restorations due to their intrinsic low fracture strength.…”
Section: Immediate Dentin Sealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for better composite resin materials led to the first significant development in filler technology in 1975 when Kulzer and Ivoclar filed patents in Germany for composite materials containing “microfine fillers with particle sizes of the order of 0.07 um,” which would later become microfilled composite resins 143 . These materials contained 35–50% filler by weight with 0.04 μm silica filler particles and prepolymerized resin fillers to compensate for their low filler content.…”
Section: Universal Composite Resinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El éxito de la unión entre el cerámico y el metal depende de: 1) la capacidad de la aleación de formar óxidos superficiales solubles en el vidrio de la porcelana, (por medio de un TT sobre el sustrato) 2) la mayor similitud entre el coeficiente de variación dimensional térmica de ambos materiales, 3) la temperatura de fusión del metal, ésta debe ser muy elevada respecto a la correspondiente de la porcelana pues así se evita el efecto de creep que sufre el metal al fundir la porcelana por medio de tratamientos térmi-cos llamados cocciones sobre la aleación y 4) el módulo elástico del metal, que debe ser suficiente para brindar la rigidez necesaria al conjunto, según la porcelana a utilizar. La adherencia de estos sistemas es estudiada según la Norma IRAM ISO 9693, específica para Sistemas Metal-Cerámicos de Restauración Dental [4,5,6,7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified