Dental Implant Outcomes in Grafted Sockets: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ramanauskaitė, Aušra; Borges, Tiago; Almeida, Bruno Leitão de; Correia, André

doi:10.5037/jomr.2019.10308

Cited by 21 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Outcomes of clinical studies on the long-term survival rates of implants placed in augmented vs. pristine bone is still controversial. While some studies indicated comparable outcomes in terms of implant survival rates and marginal bone loss [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ], other studies reported inferior results for implants placed in augmented sites [ 5 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peri-Implantitis: A Clinical Update on Prevalence and Surgical Treatment Outcomes

Roccuzzo

Stähli

Monje

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental implants may be considered a reliable routine procedure in clinical practice for the replacement of missing teeth. Results from long-term studies indicate that implant-supported dental prostheses constitute a predictable treatment method for the management of fully and partially edentulous patients. Implants and their restorations, however, are not free from biological complications. In fact, peri-implantitis, defined as progressive bone loss associated to clinical inflammation, is not a rare finding nowadays. This constitutes a concern for clinicians and patients given the negative impact on the quality of life and the sequelae originated by peri-implantitis lesions. The purpose of this narrative review is to report on the prevalence of peri-implantitis and to overview the indications, contraindications, complexity, predictability and effectiveness of the different surgical therapeutic modalities to manage this disorder.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peri-Implantitis: A Clinical Update on Prevalence and Surgical Treatment Outcomes

Roccuzzo

Stähli

Monje

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4. Dental Implant Outcomes in Grafted Sockets: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Ramanauskaite et al [4])…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The 2nd Baltic Osseointegration Academy and Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Consensus Conference 2019. Summary and Consensus Statements: Group II - Extraction Socket Preservation Methods and Dental Implant Placement Outcomes within Grafted Sockets

Galindo‐Moreno¹,

Amo²,

Almeida³

et al. 2019

JOMR

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe task of Group II was to review and update the existing data concerning extraction socket preservation with or without membranes and soft tissue influence on post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation; extraction socket preservation using different biomaterials as bone grafts, growth factors, and stem cells. Special interest was paid to the dental implant placement outcomes within grafted sockets.Material and MethodsThe main areas evaluated by this group were as follows: quantitative and qualitative assessment of the effect of different alveolar preservation techniques performed immediately after tooth extraction, with or without membranes and/or soft tissue grafting, and the use of different bone substitutes, stem cells or growth factors in the postextraction socket. Evaluation of the treatment outcomes of dental implants placed in the grafted sockets in terms of primary and secondary outcomes were assessed. The systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses were registered in PROSPERO, an international prospective register of systematic reviews: . TThe literature in the corresponding areas of interest was screened and reported following the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) Statement: . Method of preparation of the systematic reviews, based on comprehensive search strategies, was discussed and standardized. The summary of the materials and methods employed by the authors in preparing the systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses is presented in the Preface chapter.ResultsThe results and conclusions of the review process are presented in the respective papers. Three systematic reviews and one systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The group's general commentaries, consensus statements, clinical recommendations and implications for research are presented in this article.

show abstract

“…The values accepted as a reasonable guideline for MBL are 1.5 mm for the first year following loading of the implant and 0.2 mm of additional loss for each subsequent year [ 37 ]. A recent literature review by Ramanauskaite et al [ 37 ], including 7 RCTs, reported MBL changes between implants placed into the naturally healed sites or the previously grafted sockets. Two of them revealed no significant difference [ 38 , 39 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study

Guarnieri

Savio²,

Bermonds³

et al. 2020

JOMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to compare clinical outcomes, soft tissues conditions and differences in marginal bone loss between implants with a laser-microgrooved collar placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, over a period of 5 years after functional loading. Material and Methods Patients of Group 1 underwent extractions with sockets preservation using porcine-derived bone, covered with collagen membrane. Group 2 underwent extractions without socket preservation. Patients of Group 1 received implants in grafted sites, and Group 2 received implants in spontaneously healed bone using a maxillary sinus lift with crestal approach. Results Over the observation period, the overall clinical success rate in Group 1 and Group 2 was 98% and 100%, respectively, with no differences between the procedures and implants used. Cumulative radiographic marginal bone loss ranged from 0.03 to 0.39 mm after 60 months of functional loading. There were no statistically significant differences in marginal bone loss between short and standard-length implants placed in grafted extraction sockets and in pristine bone. Conclusions Short and standard implants with a laser-microgrooved collar, placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, exhibited no statistical difference in success rate, clinical parameters and marginal bone loss.

show abstract

Dental Implant Outcomes in Grafted Sockets: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cited by 21 publications

References 35 publications

Peri-Implantitis: A Clinical Update on Prevalence and Surgical Treatment Outcomes

Peri-Implantitis: A Clinical Update on Prevalence and Surgical Treatment Outcomes

The 2nd Baltic Osseointegration Academy and Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Consensus Conference 2019. Summary and Consensus Statements: Group II - Extraction Socket Preservation Methods and Dental Implant Placement Outcomes within Grafted Sockets

Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About