1991
DOI: 10.1177/00220345910700070201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental Caries and Fluoride Exposure in Western Australia

Abstract: Most water supplies in Western Australia (WA) have been fluoridated since about 1968, but one region has persistently resisted. Supplement use has been encouraged there, and fluoride toothpaste is widely used. Caries prevalence and caries experience in children in Perth (F- 0.8 mg/L) have declined steadily since fluoridation, but in the Bunbury region (F- less than 0.2 mg/L), caries measures remain higher than in Perth. The purpose of this study was to correlate the magnitude and timing of fluoride exposure wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insofar as fluoride supplements contribute to caries prevention, a contentious question, their reduced use should entail a greater risk of dental caries. The 12‐year‐old children examined in 1989/90 had caries experience levels of 0.89 DMFT in the Perth region and 1.57 DMFT in the Bunbury (nonfluoridated) region (26). In the present study, the corresponding caries experience scores were 0.31 (SD 0.75) DMFT in the fluoridated area and 0.28 (SD 0.77) DMFT in the nonfluoridated area, but since the current data are derived from 10‐year‐olds in 2000 against 12‐year‐olds in 1989/90, these figures are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insofar as fluoride supplements contribute to caries prevention, a contentious question, their reduced use should entail a greater risk of dental caries. The 12‐year‐old children examined in 1989/90 had caries experience levels of 0.89 DMFT in the Perth region and 1.57 DMFT in the Bunbury (nonfluoridated) region (26). In the present study, the corresponding caries experience scores were 0.31 (SD 0.75) DMFT in the fluoridated area and 0.28 (SD 0.77) DMFT in the nonfluoridated area, but since the current data are derived from 10‐year‐olds in 2000 against 12‐year‐olds in 1989/90, these figures are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1977]. The reliability of caries measurements, assessed using the method of error variance [Rugg-Gunn and Holloway, 1974], was calculated to be 0.84 [Riordan. 1991].…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the number of dentinal lesions in the non-fluoridated areas was greater, it was concluded that progression of lesions was faster in non-fluoridated areas than in lluoridated areas. In other words, the pre-eruptive effeet of water fiuoridation could not be observed when the total numbers of lesions, including enamel lesions, were compared (4,5), Two more recent studies, which monitored enamel caries in Australian and in Tanzanian child and adolescent populations, suggested that the posteruptive caries-preventive effect of fluoride in drinking water was just as important as the pre-eruptive eariespreventive effect, particularly for freesmooth surfaces and approximal surfaces, where constant exposure to low doses of fluoride can retard or arrest the rate of caries progression (6)(7)(8), Similar to the Dutch water fluoridation studies, these studies revealed that caries progression beyond the stage of enamel caries was markedly reduced in fluoridated areas in both countries, Ekanayake & Sheiham (9) examined the decline in caries rates in the 1960s and 1970s and found that in the 1970s the rate of caries progression for British schoolchildren was slower in fluoridated areas than in non-fluoridated areas, flowever, these rates were slower than those reported for a similar cohort of British children studied in the 1960s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%