2014
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-2014-12284-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density problems on vector bundles and manifolds

Abstract: Abstract. We study some canonical differential operators on vector bundles over smooth, complete Riemannian manifolds. Under very general assumptions, we show that smooth, compactly supported sections are dense in the domains of these operators. Furthermore, we show that smooth, compactly supported functions are dense in second order Sobolev spaces on such manifolds under the sole additional assumption that the Ricci curvature is uniformly bounded from below.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. If Ric ≥ −C for some C ≥ 0, then M satisfies the L 2 -Calderon-Zygmund inequality, with C 2 = 1, D 2 = C, thus in case q = 2, we recover Theorem 1.1 in [2] within the class of of M's with nonnegative Ricci curvature (noting that the proof of Theorem 1.1 in [2] heavily relies on Hilbert space arguments and thus does not extend directly to general q's). We refer the reader to the monograph [14] for results into this direction on the whole L q -scale.…”
Section: Denseness Of Cmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…1. If Ric ≥ −C for some C ≥ 0, then M satisfies the L 2 -Calderon-Zygmund inequality, with C 2 = 1, D 2 = C, thus in case q = 2, we recover Theorem 1.1 in [2] within the class of of M's with nonnegative Ricci curvature (noting that the proof of Theorem 1.1 in [2] heavily relies on Hilbert space arguments and thus does not extend directly to general q's). We refer the reader to the monograph [14] for results into this direction on the whole L q -scale.…”
Section: Denseness Of Cmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, recall that the divergence operator is then div = −∇ 2 * . It is well known that C ∞ c (V) is dense in W 1,2 (V) and when g is smooth, that C ∞ c (T * M ⊗ V) is dense in D(div) (see [5]). In what is to follow, we will sometimes write ∇ in place of ∇ 2 .…”
Section: Manifolds and Vector Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining this with Theorem 1 of McIntosh and the author in [6], we obtain the following important corollary.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 65%