2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-016-1641-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rough metrics on manifolds and quadratic estimates

Abstract: Abstract. We study the persistence of quadratic estimates related to the Kato square root problem across a change of metric on smooth manifolds by defining a class of Riemannian-like metrics that are permitted to be of low regularity and degenerate on sets of measure zero. We also demonstrate how to transmit quadratic estimates between manifolds which are homeomorphic and locally bi-Lipschitz. As a consequence, we demonstrate the invariance of the Kato square root problem under Lipschitz transformations of the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now assume that s is essentially self-adjoint. Taking closures in (L) and using Proposition 3.4 we obtain (3), which leads to D = s = N , that is, W 1,2 0 (V) = W 1,2 (V). Now by Theorem 5.1 and Proposition 3.5, it follows that (M, V, ∇) has negligible boundary.…”
Section: Negligible Boundarymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now assume that s is essentially self-adjoint. Taking closures in (L) and using Proposition 3.4 we obtain (3), which leads to D = s = N , that is, W 1,2 0 (V) = W 1,2 (V). Now by Theorem 5.1 and Proposition 3.5, it follows that (M, V, ∇) has negligible boundary.…”
Section: Negligible Boundarymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some initial progress in this direction can be found in [3] for the special case of Sobolev spaces of functions under so-called "rough metrics." These considerations are beyond the scope of this paper and we will always assume compatibility between the metric and connection unless otherwise stated.…”
Section: Proposition 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computing in L 2 allows us to assert that div g f = θ −1 divg(θEf ) (c.f. Proposition 12 in [4]). Therefore,…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This allows us to define measurable functions f : M → C, and by Γ(V), we denote measurable sections over V to be sections v = v i e i in continuous local frames {e i } with v i a measurable function. See [4] for a detailed construction.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation