1976
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.14.327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density perturbations in cosmological models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the variables in Bardeen's theory are defined with respect to a particular coordinate system, making their geometrical and physical meaning not very transparent See the discussion in [35]. By using a covariant approach, one circumvents these problems by using the spatial curvature rather than the metric as the defining variables [36,37]. In this way, a set of gauge-invariant perturbation variables can be easily identified as the ones that vanish on the chosen background [38][39][40][41][42][43][44]50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the variables in Bardeen's theory are defined with respect to a particular coordinate system, making their geometrical and physical meaning not very transparent See the discussion in [35]. By using a covariant approach, one circumvents these problems by using the spatial curvature rather than the metric as the defining variables [36,37]. In this way, a set of gauge-invariant perturbation variables can be easily identified as the ones that vanish on the chosen background [38][39][40][41][42][43][44]50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bardeen's approach, however, is of considerable complexity as it determines a set of gauge-invariant quantities that are related to density perturbations but are not perturbations themselves. Building on earlier work by Hawking (1966), Stewart & Walker (1974) and Olson (1976), Ellis & Bruni (1989) [12] formulated a fully covariant gauge-invariant treatment of cosmological perturbations. Their approach, which is of high mathematical elegance and physical transparency, has the additional advantage of starting from the fully non-linear equations before linearizing them about a chosen background.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solution for this difficulty was found by looking for gauge-independent combinations which are written in terms of the metric tensor and its derivatives by many authors (cf. Bardeen 1980, Hawking 1966, Jones 1976, Olson 1976, Brandenberger 1983, Vishniac 1990.…”
Section: Perturbation Theory In Qm Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could imaginewhich has been used a number of times in the literature (Hawking 1966, Olson 1976)-that for FRW cosmology the perturbations of its main characteristics (the energy density, δρ the scalar of curvature δR and the Hubble expansion factor δθ) would be natural quantities to be considered as basic for the perturbation scheme. However, these are not "good" scalars, since they are not zero in the background 13 .…”
Section: Friedman Universe: Scalar Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%