2008
DOI: 10.1021/ct700250a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density Functional Theory in Transition-Metal Chemistry:  Relative Energies of Low-Lying States of Iron Compounds and the Effect of Spatial Symmetry Breaking

Abstract: Abstract:The ground and lower excited states of Fe 2 , Fe 2 -, and FeO + were studied using a number of density functional theory (DFT) methods. Specific attention was paid to the relative state energies, the internuclear distances (r e ), and the harmonic vibrational frequencies (ω e ). A number of factors influencing the calculated values of these properties were examined. These include basis sets, the nature of the density functional chosen, the percentage of HartreeFock exchange in the density functional, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31,78,79 Including higher order dependence on the density as in a meta-GGA improves identification of some high-spin states: Fe(II) (NH 3 ) 6 and Fe(III) (NCH) 6 are predicted to be high spin with a meta-GGA, while they were predicted to be low-spin with a GGA. However, meta-GGA results are inconsistent: Fe(III) (NH3) 6 31,80 but the meta-GGA predicts both to be low-spin.…”
Section: Dependence Of Spin-state Ordering On Functional Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,78,79 Including higher order dependence on the density as in a meta-GGA improves identification of some high-spin states: Fe(II) (NH 3 ) 6 and Fe(III) (NCH) 6 are predicted to be high spin with a meta-GGA, while they were predicted to be low-spin with a GGA. However, meta-GGA results are inconsistent: Fe(III) (NH3) 6 31,80 but the meta-GGA predicts both to be low-spin.…”
Section: Dependence Of Spin-state Ordering On Functional Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several benchmark studies [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] have explored the performance of using ground-state density functionals within the adiabatic approximation for the calculation of vertically excited states using TDDFT. The scope of the previous benchmark studies has been primarily limited to singlet valence excited states [36][37][38][39] with very few benchmarks considering triplet valence [40][41][42] or singlet and triplet Rydberg excited states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, very few benchmark studies have investigated the performance of meta-generalized gradient approximation (mGGA) density functionals for the calculation of vertical excitation energies with TDDFT. [44][45][46][47][48] It is therefore of interest to perform benchmarks that assess the performance of density functionals, including recently developed mGGA functionals, for the vertical excitation energy calculation of singlet, triplet, valence, and Rydberg excited states using TDDFT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To shed light on this issue we investigated the larger model M3, with 456 atoms, using DFT+U and plane wave calculations, as implemented in VASP, which performs quite well for magnetic molecules. 52 Indeed, earlier studies showed that VASP calculations reproduced G09 results within a 0.5 kcal mol –1 limit of accuracy. 53 Using model M3 we re-optimized the structures along the favored reaction pathway corresponding to the reduced [Fe 4 S 4 ] + state in the presence of a protonated Glu126.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%