Density estimation and adaptive bandwidths: A primer for public health practitioners

Abstract

BackgroundGeographic information systems have advanced the ability to both visualize and analyze point data. While point-based maps can be aggregated to differing areal units and examined at varying resolutions, two problems arise 1) the modifiable areal unit problem and 2) any corresponding data must be available both at the scale of analysis and in the same geographic units. Kernel density estimation (KDE) produces a smooth, continuous surface where each location in the study area is assigned a density value irrespective of arbitrary administrative boundaries. We review KDE, and introduce the technique of utilizing an adaptive bandwidth to address the underlying heterogeneous population distributions common in public health research.ResultsThe density of occurrences should not be interpreted without knowledge of the underlying population distribution. When the effect of the background population is successfully accounted for, differences in point patterns in similar population areas are more discernible; it is generally these variations that are of most interest. A static bandwidth KDE does not distinguish the spatial extents of interesting areas, nor does it expose patterns above and beyond those due to geographic variations in the density of the underlying population. An adaptive bandwidth method uses background population data to calculate a kernel of varying size for each individual case. This limits the influence of a single case to a small spatial extent where the population density is high as the bandwidth is small. If the primary concern is distance, a static bandwidth is preferable because it may be better to define the "neighborhood" or exposure risk based on distance. If the primary concern is differences in exposure across the population, a bandwidth adapting to the population is preferred.ConclusionsKernel density estimation is a useful way to consider exposure at any point within a spatial frame, irrespective of administrative boundaries. Utilization of an adaptive bandwidth may be particularly useful in comparing two similarly populated areas when studying health disparities or other issues comparing populations in public health.

Objective Measures of the Built Environment and Physical Activity in Children: From Walkability to Moveability

“…11 However, the kernel density was implemented based on a fixed bandwidth. Therefore, possible methodological improvements such as the use of cross-validation to choose an optimal bandwidth or the use of an adaptive bandwidth to consider environmental variability in the underlying residential density 29 have to be investigated. Besides multiple determinants of physical activity in children that exist on the individual level, our study supports the evidence that physical activity of children is also influenced by built environment characteristics.…”

Using a dual kernel density estimate as a preliminary evaluation of the spatial distribution of diagnosed chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Edo State, Nigeria

“…It was necessary to examine the density of CKD in relation to the underlying population and not just the concentration of the cases across the study area. This is because health outcomes generally involve people and the spatial patterns of these outcomes are likely to reflect the spatial distribution of the underlying population (Carlos et al 2010). Fig.…”

Mapping and monitoring unemployment hot spots towards identification of socially excluded localities: Case study of Ostrava

“…The bandwidth of kernel controls the smoothness of the estimate (fixed or adaptive). The increasing bandwidth provides a greater smoothing effect (a more generalised surface) but higher risk of removing meaningful hot or cold spots from the original data distribution (Carlos, Shi, Sargent, Tanski, & Berke, 2010). Turlach (1993) identifies the bandwidth selection as the crucial step of the KDE and explains that no definite and unique solution to this problem exists.…”