2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10144-015-0515-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density‐dependent dispersal complicates spatial synchrony in tri‐trophic food chains

Abstract: Spatial synchrony can increase extinction risk and undermines metapopulation persistence. Both dispersal and biotic interactions can strongly affect spatial synchrony. Here, we explore the spatial synchrony of a tri‐trophic food chain in two patches connected by density‐dependent dispersal, namely the strategies of prey evasion (PE) and predator pursuit (PP). The dynamics of the food chain are depicted by both the Hastings–Powell model and the chemostat model, with synchrony measured by the Pearson correlation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not surprisingly therefore, density-dependence of dispersal has been thoroughly investigated both theoretically and empirically. Theoretical investigations have focused on the effects of DDD on population distribution (Namba 1980), synchrony (Liu et al 2016), and source-sink dynamics (Amarasekare 2004), as well as the conditions under which DDD is expected to evolve (Travis et al 1999, Metz and Gyllenberg 2001, Poethke and Hovestadt 2002. Empirical studies across multiple taxa show that increased intraspecific competition is expected to drive higher emigration at high densities, leading to positive DDD (De Meester and Bonte 2010, Lutz et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly therefore, density-dependence of dispersal has been thoroughly investigated both theoretically and empirically. Theoretical investigations have focused on the effects of DDD on population distribution (Namba 1980), synchrony (Liu et al 2016), and source-sink dynamics (Amarasekare 2004), as well as the conditions under which DDD is expected to evolve (Travis et al 1999, Metz and Gyllenberg 2001, Poethke and Hovestadt 2002. Empirical studies across multiple taxa show that increased intraspecific competition is expected to drive higher emigration at high densities, leading to positive DDD (De Meester and Bonte 2010, Lutz et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersal also enables prey to escape their predators by migrating in a "refuge" patch where they are less abundant. This can be represented by density-dependent dispersal rates, which have a strong impact on dynamics (Hauzy et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2016). However, densitydependent dispersal changes the relative importance of dispersal and local demography as dispersal then scales with biomass similarly to self-regulation or predation, thus changing the interplay between dispersal and biomass distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersal also enables prey to escape their predators by migrating in a "refuge" patch where they are less abundant. This can be represented by density-dependent dispersal rates, which have a strong impact on dynamics (Hauzy et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2016). However, density-dependent dispersal changes the relative importance of dispersal and local demography as dispersal then scales with biomass similarly to self-regulation or predation, thus changing the interplay between dispersal and biomass distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%