2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.21.914093
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchrony and perturbation transmission in trophic metacommunities

Abstract: In a world where natural habitats are ever more fragmented, the dynamics of metacommunities is essential to properly understand species responses to perturbations. If species' populations fluctuate asynchronously, the risk of their simultaneous extinction is low, thus reducing the species' regional extinction risk. We propose a metacommunity model consisting of two food chains connected by dispersal to study the transmission of small perturbations affecting populations in the vicinity of an equilibrium. We sho… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stochastic perturbations are defined by their standard deviation σ i and a white noise term dW i with mean 0 and variance 1. In addition, perturbations scale with each species' biomass with an exponent z depending on the type of perturbation considered (Haegeman and Loreau, 2011;Arnoldi et al, 2019): exogenous stochasticity (from harvesting for instance) corresponds to z = 0, demographic stochasticity (from birth-death processes) to z = 0.5, and environmental factors to z = 1 (see demonstration in Lande et al, 2003 and in the Supplementary Material of Quévreux et al, 2021a). Arnoldi et al (2019) showed that when a species is perturbed, the ratio of its biomass variance to perturbation variance increases with the species' biomass in the case of environmental perturbations, while it is independent of its biomass in the case of demographic perturbations.…”
Section: Measuring Stability Stochastic Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Stochastic perturbations are defined by their standard deviation σ i and a white noise term dW i with mean 0 and variance 1. In addition, perturbations scale with each species' biomass with an exponent z depending on the type of perturbation considered (Haegeman and Loreau, 2011;Arnoldi et al, 2019): exogenous stochasticity (from harvesting for instance) corresponds to z = 0, demographic stochasticity (from birth-death processes) to z = 0.5, and environmental factors to z = 1 (see demonstration in Lande et al, 2003 and in the Supplementary Material of Quévreux et al, 2021a). Arnoldi et al (2019) showed that when a species is perturbed, the ratio of its biomass variance to perturbation variance increases with the species' biomass in the case of environmental perturbations, while it is independent of its biomass in the case of demographic perturbations.…”
Section: Measuring Stability Stochastic Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arnoldi et al (2019) showed that when a species is perturbed, the ratio of its biomass variance to perturbation variance increases with the species' biomass in the case of environmental perturbations, while it is independent of its biomass in the case of demographic perturbations. Therefore, Quévreux et al (2021a) and Quévreux et al (2021c) chose demographic perturbations in their analysis as these enabled them to perturb different species with the same relative intensity regardless of their abundance.…”
Section: Measuring Stability Stochastic Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations