2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0432-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density, climate and varying return points: an analysis of long-term population fluctuations in the threatened European tree frog

Abstract: Experimental research has identified many putative agents of amphibian decline, yet the population-level consequences of these agents remain unknown, owing to lack of information on compensatory density dependence in natural populations. Here, we investigate the relative importance of intrinsic (density-dependent) and extrinsic (climatic) factors impacting the dynamics of a tree frog (Hyla arborea) population over 22 years. A combination of log-linear density dependence and rainfall (with a 2-year time lag cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This mean return rate was estimated to s a =0.303 (SD=0.097). This value is consistent with our own observations in similar CMR experiments in western Switzerland (Pellet et al 2006).…”
Section: Population-based Stochastic Simulation Model (Ramas)supporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This mean return rate was estimated to s a =0.303 (SD=0.097). This value is consistent with our own observations in similar CMR experiments in western Switzerland (Pellet et al 2006).…”
Section: Population-based Stochastic Simulation Model (Ramas)supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Given the above transition matrix L (3), we simulated the dynamic of a single population over 50 years. We then compared the resulting SD(k) with observed variations in the growth rate over 20 years in an isolated population near Lerchenfeld (Pellet et al 2006). Standard deviation on the mean growth rate was estimated as SD(k RAMAS )= 0.860, while the observed value was SD(k obs )=0.668, thus suggesting that our transition matrix provided a reasonably good approximation of environmental stochasticity.…”
Section: Population-based Stochastic Simulation Model (Ramas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Put simply, in a growing population, early maturity is favored whereas delayed maturity is favored in shrinking populations (Stearns 1992). Amphibian populations are notorious for strong fluctuations in size (Semlitsch et al 1996, Meyer et al 1998, Pellet et al 2006. In years when the population is about to grow, early metamorphosis at a small size may be favored because it leads to early maturity.…”
Section: Fig 3 Integrative Measures Of Juvenile Performance (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption that population growth rate decreases when population density increases seems reasonable for most organisms. However, the impact of intraspecific competition on wild populations may be masked by a set of important density-independent factors, including climate change and habitat perturbations (Saether et al 1999, Sanders and Gordon 2004, Pellet et al 2006. A negative feedback between population density and population growth rate can derive from two nonexclusive phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%