2014
DOI: 10.11138/ccmbm/2014.11.3.226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling

Abstract: The application of Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in orthopaedic surgery gradually has been extended from the study of osteoporosis to different areas of interest like the study of the relation between bone and prosthetic implants. Aim of this review is to analyze changes that occur in periprosthetic bone after the implantation of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) or a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In THA the pattern of adaptive bone remodeling with different cementless femoral stems varies and it appea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the present time, DEXA is considered the most reliable tool for evaluating pre-existing bone quality in order to plan correctly surgical procedure and study bone remodelling after THA as it is more sensitive and precise than conventional X-rays [20,21]. Analysis of seven periprosthetic Gruen zones is the most commonly used protocol for evaluating bone remodelling after the implantation of conventional femoral stems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the present time, DEXA is considered the most reliable tool for evaluating pre-existing bone quality in order to plan correctly surgical procedure and study bone remodelling after THA as it is more sensitive and precise than conventional X-rays [20,21]. Analysis of seven periprosthetic Gruen zones is the most commonly used protocol for evaluating bone remodelling after the implantation of conventional femoral stems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 ] Similar findings were reported by a previous review which summarized the pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling that short stems with metaphyseal fixation in SHA allowed a decrease of bone loss in proximal femur compared with THA. [ 33 ] However, these results lack a randomization or direct comparison between SHA and THA which may reduce the power of comparability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, DEXA analysis could be used also in the assessment of bone remodeling of the femoral condyles after TKR [7]. Three studies show a dominating tendency toward decrease in tibia and femur bone mineral density (BMD) after the implantation of TKR [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, BMD was shown to be an effective tool only in some specific loading conditions, as stated in a preclinical cadaveric study [20].…”
Section: Causes and Evaluation Methods Of Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%