2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dense Label Encoding for Boundary Discontinuity Free Rotation Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
111
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being observed from an overhead perspective, the objects in aerial images present more diversified orientations. Oriented object detection [1]- [5], [36]- [44] is an extension of horizontal object detection to accurately outline the objects, especially those with large aspect ratios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Being observed from an overhead perspective, the objects in aerial images present more diversified orientations. Oriented object detection [1]- [5], [36]- [44] is an extension of horizontal object detection to accurately outline the objects, especially those with large aspect ratios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fast and accurate oriented object detection, R 3 Det [42] and O 2 -DNet [43] make attempts in one-stage model with RetinaNet and anchor free structures. Based on R 3 Det, R 3 Det-DCL [5] designs Densely Coded Labels (DCL) for angle classification, which replaces the Sparsely Coded Label (SCL) in classification-based detectors before, and reduces three times training speed, further bringing notable improvements in accuracy of detection tasks. What's more, for oriented object detection, SCRDet [4] combines pixel and channel attention network for small and cluttered objects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of peer methods. Table 5 compares the six peer techniques, including IoU-Smooth L1 Loss [3], Modulated loss [43], RIL [32], CSL [4], DCL [44], and GWD [5] on DOTA-v1.0. For fairness, these methods are all implemented on the same baseline method, and are trained and tested under the same environment and hyperparameters.…”
Section: Ablation Study and Further Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%