Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05.
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2005.1526033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denormalization of visibilities for in-orbit calibration of interferometric radiometers

Abstract: Abstract-This paper reviews the relative calibration of an interferometric radiometer taking into account the experimental results of the first batch of receivers developed in the frame of the European Space Agency's Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity mission. Measurements show state-of-the-art baseline performance as long as the system is capable of correcting the effect of orbital temperature swing. A method to validate internal calibration during in-orbit deep-sky views and to correct linearity errors is also… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10. These results are compatible with the characterization performed at subsystem level [16]. Considering that the average gain and offset are about 1 mV/K and −1700 mV (see Fig.…”
Section: B Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…10. These results are compatible with the characterization performed at subsystem level [16]. Considering that the average gain and offset are about 1 mV/K and −1700 mV (see Fig.…”
Section: B Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The variation of the phase of the correlator gain G kj with respect to temperature was found to be much more complex than initially found in [16]. For two receivers sharing the same local oscillator, this phase roughly follows the average physical temperature of the two receivers involved, as expected.…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This technique is known as the four-point method, and allows us to compute the PMS gains and offsets as [16]:…”
Section: Pms Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%