2015
DOI: 10.1109/jdt.2014.2382295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstration of an Autostereoscopic Three-Dimensional Light-Emitting Diode Display Using Diffractive Optical Elements Sheet

Abstract: A prototype autostereoscopic three-dimensional (3D) light-emitting diode (LED) display using a cylindrical diffractive optical elements (C-DOEs) sheet as the optical steering element is proposed. The operation of the system and the calculation method of the system parameters are described in detail. The DOEs sheet is placed from a distance from the LED display panel which is five times smaller of the existing technology, and the column spacings of the pixels of the LED display panel are nonequal in order to eq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An AD prototype developed by our lab [6] is employed to verify our theory. This prototype is based on a light emitting diode (LED) display.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An AD prototype developed by our lab [6] is employed to verify our theory. This prototype is based on a light emitting diode (LED) display.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viewing through parallax barriers and lenticular sheets are the dominant autostereoscopic technologies [3][4][5]. Compared to the low transmittance of parallax barrier, lenticular sheet-based technique is better for outdoor use [6]. Pixels in autostereoscopic displays (ADs) are classified to display stereo images of different views, and every view of stereo images are directed into different regions by parallax barriers or lenticular sheet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 So, the neareye 3D display has become a hot spot today. [2][3][4][5][6] Existing commercialized near-eye 3D display products depend on stereoscopic technology, 7,8 which projects only one perspective view to each eye of the viewer and results in loss of monocular depth cues. For a displayed spatial point, the convergence of the two passing-through cone-shaped beams coming from the two perspective views on the screen gives a virtual 3D depth perception to the user, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the holographic technologies still have some disadvantages for commercial purposes, such as the need to improve the video‐rate so that the viewer does not experience any lag or flicker problem. Even though the disadvantages exist, the naked‐eye 3D imaging had already proven desirable for social media users because of its obvious benefits, in which the viewer does not need to wear the heavy glasses beside it is more likely to be transported into mobile terminals including display modules, where the increasing ability to produce the naked‐eye 3D imaging has almost actualized for commercial purposes . Henceforth, many investigations have used the advantages of micro/nanomaterial technologies, to serve the large demands of users, where the functional 3D imaging is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%