2022
DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic trends in the incidence of malignant appendiceal tumours in England between 1995 and 2016: Population-based analysis

Abstract: Aims Recent data suggest that the incidence of malignant appendiceal tumours is increasing. This study aimed to determine temporal trends in the incidence of malignant appendiceal tumours within England and a possible influence by demographic factors. Methods All incident cases of appendiceal tumours in patients aged 20 years and above were identified from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service database between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent publication from the UK, Orchard et al similarly examined time trends in appendiceal tumours [19]. The authors determined that the main increase in cases was seen in low-grade NET and argue that this may either be associated with the overall rate of appendectomy or rather the handling of the appendix specimen.…”
Section: Discussion and Con Clus Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent publication from the UK, Orchard et al similarly examined time trends in appendiceal tumours [19]. The authors determined that the main increase in cases was seen in low-grade NET and argue that this may either be associated with the overall rate of appendectomy or rather the handling of the appendix specimen.…”
Section: Discussion and Con Clus Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several studies older patients appear to be more at risk for a missed diagnosis when treated for a presumed appendicitis or during an interval appendectomy [17, 18]. In a recent publication from the UK, Orchard et al similarly examined time trends in appendiceal tumours [19]. The authors determined that the main increase in cases was seen in low‐grade NET and argue that this may either be associated with the overall rate of appendectomy or rather the handling of the appendix specimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, the incidence has been increasing with numerous articles from both North America and Europe documenting a significantly increased incidence of appendiceal neoplasms (ANs) in recent decades, as high as 0.97 per 100 000 persons in the United States. [3][4][5] While most of the increased incidence may be attributed to a subset of pathologies, namely neuroendocrine histologies, the contemporary incidence of ANs establishes this pathology as a much less rare phenomenon, one that the average surgeon will likely encounter in the course of their practice. Of the more than 500 000 appendectomies performed yearly, approximately 0.9%-1.4% of these specimens will include AN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, these tumors have been considered extremely rare, with a reported incidence of 0.12 per million person‐years in the United States 2 . However, the incidence has been increasing with numerous articles from both North America and Europe documenting a significantly increased incidence of appendiceal neoplasms (ANs) in recent decades, as high as 0.97 per 100 000 persons in the United States 3–5 . While most of the increased incidence may be attributed to a subset of pathologies, namely neuroendocrine histologies, the contemporary incidence of ANs establishes this pathology as a much less rare phenomenon, one that the average surgeon will likely encounter in the course of their practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although primary carcinomas of the appendix are rare malignancies, with approximately one to two cases per 100,000 people in the United States annually, [1][2][3] the incidence of appendiceal cancer has consistently increased over the past 3 decades, rising by 54%-232%. [2][3][4] Unfortunately, few clinical advances were made over the preceding decade because of the rare and heterogeneous nature of this disease. In addition, histologic subtype, as well as tumor grade and stage, is increasingly acknowledged as being strongly associated with variations in survival outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%