2010
DOI: 10.1080/17475759.2010.520837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic and Religious Differences in the Dimensions of Self-Disclosure Among Hindus and Muslims in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women seem to disclose more than men (Dindia & Allen, 1992;Croucher, Faulkner, Oommen, & Long, 2010) while any dyad including a woman will result in more disclosure than dyads consisting only of men (Janofsky, 1971). Janofsky also found that status plays a role, with men disclosing more to higher-status interlocutors while women disclose more to lower-status interlocutors.…”
Section: Self-disclosurementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Women seem to disclose more than men (Dindia & Allen, 1992;Croucher, Faulkner, Oommen, & Long, 2010) while any dyad including a woman will result in more disclosure than dyads consisting only of men (Janofsky, 1971). Janofsky also found that status plays a role, with men disclosing more to higher-status interlocutors while women disclose more to lower-status interlocutors.…”
Section: Self-disclosurementioning
confidence: 96%
“…A study conducted in India showed that Hindus disclosed more than Muslims (Croucher, et al, 2010). Wolfson & Pearce, 1983).…”
Section: Journal Of Middle East Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social scientists (Tardy & Dindia, 2006: 229; Gordon, 2011: 72) have pursued this line of enquiry since seminal work brought it into academic focus half a century ago (Jourard & Lasakow, 1958; Jourard, 1971; Cozby, 1972; Chelune et al, 1979). Self-disclosure has primarily been explored as a communication issue (see, Hargie, Dickson, Mallett, & Stringer, 2008; Chen & Nakazawa, 2009; Croucher, Faulkner, & Long, 2010; Diverniero & Hosek, 2011; Jiang, Bazarova, & Hancock, 2011; Tian, 2011) but has also attracted interest in a variety of other disciplines including psychotherapy and social psychology (see, Jourard & Lakasow, 1958; Jourard, 1971; Chelune et al, 1979: 2; Doster & Nesbitt, 1979; Kelly & McKillop, 1996; Petronio, Reeder, Hecht, & Ros-Mendoza, 1996; Omarzu, 2000; Antaki, Barnes, & Leudar, 2005; Derlega, Winstead, Mathews & Braitman, 2008: 115; Gelso & Palma, 2011). The underlying assumption of works from psychology and psychotherapy has been that self-disclosure is healthy or therapeutic and that repressing personal feelings is not (Antaki, Barnes, & Leudar, 2005; Pasupathi, McLean, & Weeks, 2009: 92).…”
Section: Self-disclosure: the Broad Terrainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some basic understandings about self-disclosure have been consistently upheld. Early studies established that it involves revealing personal information, not otherwise generally known (Jourard, 1971; Chelune et al, 1979; Croucher, Faulkner, & Long, 2010: 31) using the first person singular pronoun (I) (Derlega & Grzelak, 1979: 152). Self-disclosure focusses on inter-personal interaction so intra-personal reflections such as writing a personal diary, for example, do not constitute self-disclosure (Omarzu, 2000: 175; Croucher, Faulkner, & Long, 2010: 31).…”
Section: Self-disclosure: the Broad Terrainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accommodation of Muslims in the workplace based on personal and cultural identity, such as accommodations for prayer space or dietary restrictions, have important implications (Croucher, Faulkner, Oommen, & Long, 2010). Muslims and others who wear physical manifestations of a non-Christian faith (e.g., the wearing of the hijab) experience heightened levels of discrimination in a variety of forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%